Hopenhagen or hope in hell?

With the world’s environmental leaders and media gathered in Copenhagen, renamed ‘Hopenhagen’ by the locals, it is a fitting time to have another look at how the climate change discussions could impact farm animals. The way that the world deals with the big issues of our day will define the success of future generations; issues such as feeding the world, dealing with climate change and impending resource scarcities like water and oil. It will also define the way that countless billions of farm animals are treated in the future. That is why we at Compassion are active in Copenhagen.

Today, I’d like to bring you the view of one of our team, Dr Lesley Lambert, in Copenhagen. In a blog article entitled, ‘Breakfast, lunch and dinner’, Lesley wrote:

“The COP is a bit of a circus – activists, lobbyists, businesses, all jostling for access to negotiators and the media. High tech communications are everywhere, people move fast and talk, talk, talk. It’s a long way from our everyday lives but, last night, I went to a meeting which brought home to me, much closer than ever before, what the COP is really about.

The Climate Action Network International presented the view from their southern hemisphere country representatives and the most striking message came from a representative of the Federated States of Micronesia – a collection of mainly low lying islands in the South Pacific. Marstella Jack is a lawyer there, but has become a key environmental speaker for these vulnerable states. They face two major challenges – first, they are in the front line of global warming. If the seas rise, many of their islands could be swamped. Secondly, they face real food security challenges. Marstella said that, for the islanders like many others, food security is not a complex concept – it’s about breakfast, lunch and dinner – enough food to have three meals a day. Climate change poses a major threat to their agriculture if flooding becomes a real issue.

So what does this have to do with animals? Well for me it brought home, as hard as a slap in the face, the human consequences of the decisions we make about farm animals. If we, as a world, choose to eat ever more meat, there really will not be enough to feed everyone, as our latest report ‘Eating the Planet’ shows. The starkest effect though is not just food security, but combating climate change. With livestock production contributing more than transport to human-made greenhouse gas emissions, we really can dramatically reduce our impact on our environment by cutting down on meat and dairy consumption. The benefits to the environment are real and have been scientifically proven, as revealed in the latest report released yesterday from the Dutch Assessment Agency for the Environment, PBL.

What we feed ourselves, in our everyday lives, really can help determine whether those at the edge of the rising seas, or the edge of hunger, get what they need. It’s not rocket science that treating animals well, caring for their welfare, and eating responsibly is good sense – but when you can look into someone’s eyes and they tell of the threats their people face in everyday life, the human dimension is brought right home.”

If you would like to read more despatches from our front line fight against factory farming at the climate talks, please follow our dedicated Compassion in Copenhagen blog.

Leave a Reply

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.