Author Archive

The things they say…

Monday, July 5th, 2010
Eggs - CC / Flickr

Eggs - CC / Flickr

I am often struck by how ill-founded myths sometimes spring up to defend factory farming. Like that old chestnut in defence of battery cages, that ‘if hens weren’t happy, they wouldn’t lay eggs’. Thankfully, scientific evidence and common sense tell us otherwise.

Reading through media clippings recently, I was interested to come across the following quote attributed to a leading figure in the broiler chicken industry: “If we put all those birds currently housed onto free range, there wouldn’t be a mountain in Scotland or a valley in Wales or any spare business land in any town, city or village that would not have a chicken on it. It’s absolutely ludicrous and impossible to achieve. ……” And thus it seems another myth is born, giving the impression that we’d be knee-deep in chickens if those animal welfarists got their way!

Well, here at Compassion, we’ve calculated just how much space it would really take to house all the nation’s broiler chickens free range. And we are happy to share them with anyone. What they show is that, if all the UK’s broiler chickens were reared for meat on free range, they would only need an area around a third of the size of the Isle of Wight. That the total area needed would represent considerably less than one thousandth of the total area of farmland in the UK to rear them in this way. That this would also take into account leaving the ground fallow to prevent it becoming ‘fowl sick’. Add to that the scope for running poultry in wooded areas, like some of the French producers do under the prestigious Label Rouge scheme, and you can see that a free range future for the nation’s chicken flock is much more practical than some believe. And it would offer a real opportunity for UK chicken producers to differentiate their products in a market crowded by the ubiquitous factory farmed chicken.

Of course, free range is not the only way of keeping hens in higher welfare farming systems. The RSPCA Freedom Food scheme, for example, produces chickens for meat reared with more space and an extensive indoor environment. And this is a concept that appears to be taking off with consumers.

All in all, I believe that, far from being “ludicrous”, creating a fairer, free range and higher welfare future for our chickens is not only practically achievable, but would have positive benefits for producers, consumers and food quality alike. You can help us break down the barriers and myths that stand between the present and a better, fairer future for chickens that provide our meat by supporting Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, Compassion in World Farming and our Chicken Out! campaign.

Ohio agrees reforms for farm animals

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Great news from America! A ground-breaking agreement has been reached in the US state of Ohio that will see the phasing out of veal crates for calves, an end to confinement stalls for pregnant pigs as well as other key measures to protect farmed and other animals. The State Governor of Ohio, the Farm Bureau and The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) have agreed on the following landmark advances in Ohio:

  • A ban on cruel veal crates for calves by 2017
  • A ban on new confinement stalls for pregnant pigs in the state after Dec. 31, 2010. Existing facilities must cease using sow stalls within 15 years.
  • A moratorium on permits for new battery cage confinement facilities for laying hens
  • A ban on strangulation of farm animals and mandatory humane euthanasia methods for sick or injured animals
  • A ban on the transport of sick and injured cows, known as ‘downer’ cows, for slaughter
  • Enactment of legislation establishing penalties for cock fighters
  • Enactment of legislation cracking down on puppy mills
  • Enactment of a ban on the acquisition of dangerous exotic animals as pets, such as primates, bears, lions, tigers, large constricting and venomous snakes, crocodiles and alligators.

Huge congratulations to our friends at HSUS for achieving these monumental reforms for farm animals! This is a major victory that will surely quicken the trend against farming practices that cause such suffering to farm animals.

Thank you to those supporters who were able to respond to the call to support this major initiative.

Farm animals in Ohio and the world over will benefit from this reform. Compassion sends a huge vote of thanks and congratulation, particularly to Wayne Pacelle and his dedicated team at HSUS, for making it happen.

CCTV in slaughterhouses now!

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Nearly a year ago, I wrote about the need for CCTV to be installed in all abattoirs to help protect the welfare of animals at a point when they are most vulnerable, at slaughter. Anyone reading the latest exposé in the Sunday Times this week, and reported in other media, could be forgiven for thinking that our slaughterhouse industry remains in the dark ages. And it gives fresh impetus to calls for much stricter monitoring, not just some of the time, but all of the time.

CCTV always on and focused at the killing end of the slaughterhouse seems a simple innovation. After all, as I’ve said before, we live in a country where every High Street is watched by CCTV for our protection and safety. Are farm animals not equally deserving of the same? Particularly at the time when they are killed?

As I did a year ago, I again offer Compassion’s excellent staff and their outstanding expertise to Government to help train their staff to monitor the video footage taken in their country’s slaughterhouses. Round the clock monitoring would surely put to the test any procedure, training programme and compliance mechanism. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that random, unannounced checks of CCTV tapes should be carried out by Compassion to reinforce the independence of the system.

I am delighted to read that the UK’s Food Standards Agency (FSA) supports the idea of CCTV in slaughterhouses, something we will be following up with them. CCTV is not the whole answer to solving the problem of suffering and poor practice in our slaughterhouses. But it does seem to be an obvious step to introduce the transparency that is so badly needed in this aspect of our food system conducted firmly behind closed doors.

European Parliament recognises fish are sentient

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Whether they are cold or wet blooded, small and cute, or big and ugly, Compassion campaigns for all farm animals, regardless of how much public sympathy is associated with them. This is why we care about fish as well as chickens, cows, sheep, turkeys and all animals reared for food on land or in water.

I started looking into aquaculture, or fish farming, in the early 1990s. My initial forays culminated in a report being published by Compassion in 1992 which showed how tens of thousands of fish are often crammed at high stocking densities into barren cages or pens.

Ten years later I reassessed the industry in a follow-up called, In Too Deep – Why Fish Farming Needs Urgent Welfare Reform. It was whilst debating issues with the fish farming industry in Edinburgh some years later that I realised that, though the debate within this area was fast moving, serious concerns about the welfare and environmental impact of fish farming remained. That is why I asked my close colleague and fish welfare expert, Peter Stevenson, to look deeper into what seemed to me to be the murky waters of this subject in 2007. Closed Waters was the result.

Nearly 20 years of study have reaffirmed our opposition to intensively farmed fish. Why? Because fish in these waterborne factory farms suffer serious problems, including frustration often of natural behaviours, physical injuries, increased susceptibility to disease, high mortality rates and, in some countries, inhumane slaughter methods. Compassion believes the transportation, confinement and slaughter of fish as well as the environmental impact of aquaculture, including on wild fish, birds and other wildlife, is an important issue in our campaign to end factory farming.

This is why I’m excited about recent developments in the European Union. A Report by the European Parliament has called for significant changes in aquaculture and the way fish are farmed. I’m proud to say that colleagues at Compassion have played an important role in making sure the welfare of fish is taken into account more seriously than ever before. And it’s progress that would not have been possible without you and your support. Thank you!

On June 17 at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) voted overwhelmingly in favour of a Report to improve things in fish farming. The Report, ‘A new impetus for the Strategy for the Sustainable Development of European Aquaculture’, in the words of its proponent, Italian Socialist MEP Guido Milana, aims to improve “farming quality standards” and calls for improvements in the welfare of farmed fish.

The Report stresses that the new Lisbon Treaty “recognises fish as sentient beings” and commits the EU to paying “full regard to the welfare requirements of the animals”. The Report stresses the “need to reduce to a minimum the stress levels caused by farm density or transport and to search for more humane slaughter techniques, and the well-being of fish in general”. Also, the Report recommends that the European Fisheries Fund should focus support on farms which follow good practices thereby making them more economically viable for farmers to implement.

It is also too easy to forget about fish. To also think they don’t suffer. There is increasing scientific evidence that they are capable, in their own way, to experience the world in which they live. Scientists increasingly document how fish feel fear, distress and pain.

Even though there is hope for fish in the EU, we must be ever vigilant on their behalf throughout the world. For example, ‘super salmon’ – genetically modified fish that grow to adult size in half the time – could be available for human consumption in the US in two years if they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. What concerns me is that, if this happens, the company will then seek approval from the EU to market ‘super salmon’ here. We cannot let this happen! Fish need all the help we can give them. Please help us to turn back the tide on factory farming in our waters.

Commission stands firm on cage ban

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Just back from Brussels, I can report that the EU Commissioner responsible for consumer health and animal welfare, John Dalli, has reconfirmed that there will be no delay to the 2012 ban on barren battery cages. This is hugely welcome news and should help to quell industry mutterings to the contrary.

The barren battery cage, a system that still incarcerates most of Europe’s laying hens, is due to be banned in just over 18 months’ time. That victory has been hard won by you, Compassion’s wonderful supporters, who have supported our long-standing campaign together with our partner societies across Europe.

Ever since the ban was announced, however, some in agri-industry and some countries have tried to undermine the ban. The most recent attempt was by the Polish government earlier this year. We mobilised our lobbyists against this threat and were delighted when the Polish attempt was thwarted. However, the danger didn’t end there. Even last night, I heard of a rumour of delay from as far away as the USA, underlining the need for us to be vigilant. And Compassion will remain so until the awful battery cage is finally banned come 1st January 2012.

Our three adopted hens are doing well rearranging our back garden to suit themselves! Thank you to everyone who has asked how they are getting on. Hetty, Hazy and Hope, as we’ve named them, are doing well. They remind me every day of the importance of ending factory farming. That hens, in common with other animals, have their own likes and dislikes. Their own wants and needs. Their own idea of what they want to do and where they want to go. Every day, I see how important it is to them to scratch the ground under their feet and to run around the garden flapping their wings. Every day, I say thank goodness that Compassion’s dedicated supporters have done so much to make life better for the millions of birds otherwise caged for life, unable to experience the most basic of natural behaviours. And every day, our hens remind me of the importance of vigilance and of ensuring that nothing gets in the way of consigning those barren battery cages to history.

Innovative Solution

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

What if we could replace all the mince meat that we eat in dishes like hamburgers, sausages, cottage pie, meatloaf, lasagne and spaghetti bolognese with a virtually identical product; meat without killing animals?

Is this too good to be true? I don’t think so. Within the next decade, we could well see this happen.

This is because meat cultured in cell culture (in vitro) could become economically viable, certainly within most of our lifetimes. It will replace the meat eaten presently as ground or mince meat, which is said to account for at least one-half of all meat consumed. This will mean, in turn, a significant reduction in the number of animals killed for food and may well hasten our goal of ending factory farming by 2050.

This is why at our recent Board meeting, the directors unanimously agreed to a new policy. They agreed that the “development of cultured meat offers an innovative solution to meeting growing global demand for meat in a way that avoids the serious animal welfare problems associated with intensive livestock farming.” Compassion is therefore supporting this emerging technology as part of a package of solutions to providing a humane and sustainable food system for the future.

Compassion believes cultured meat has the potential to start a brand-new relationship between us and how our food is produced. Cultured meat has the potential to be healthier, safer, less polluting and more humane than conventional meat. Fat content can be more easily controlled. The incidence of food borne disease can be significantly reduced. Inedible animal structures (bones, respiratory system, digestive system, skin and the nervous system) need not be grown. As a result, the production of cultured meat is likely to be more efficient than conventional meat in its use of energy, land and water as well as producing less waste.

Furthermore, as the technology develops and economies of scale work in its favour, more complex pieces of meat (e.g. chicken leg, lamb cutlet) will be produced as cultured meat. This will profoundly impact – and drastically lower – the projected number of food animals reared worldwide.

I believe in the not too distant future many of us who eat meat will choose cultured meat for everyday meals. We will also choose for special occasions particular cuts of meat from animals raised using higher welfare methods, such as free range, and humanely killed in slaughterhouses with CCTV and other monitoring systems to protect animal welfare.

This ideal for a more humane world was also the vision of our founders, Peter and Anna Roberts. They established Direct Foods in 1969. As an organisation, our relationship with cultured meat, albeit in a different form as textured soya protein, originates with Peter and Anna, who were dairy farmers shocked at the direction agriculture was taking. Direct Foods’ mission was to provide plant-based, meat-like alternatives. This included Sosmix, Burgamix and Protoveg.

From working closely with Peter for so many years I learned the importance of campaigning as pragmatic idealists. Progress is made in steps – small and large – along the way. I believe if he were with us today he would also be championing cultured meat as an innovative solution that could transform our food and farming system for the better and for all.

All things come in threes

Friday, June 4th, 2010

Here at Compassion, we are blessed with our third wedding of the year! Congratulations to Jennifer Gatenby from our fundraising team who marries Frazer Balloch in St Lucia on Saturday 5th June. The happy couple will then return to the UK for their reception at Portsmouth’s Spinnaker Tower.

The Key to Success

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

I’m convinced the key to success in our campaign to end factory farming by 2050 is to involve as many people and as many organisations as possible. Because there are many good reasons why factory farming should be stopped (e.g. animal cruelty, unhealthy food, environmental damage, food security, economic inefficiency and world hunger), there is room for everyone to make a difference regardless of their reason why.

This is why I believe our role at Compassion is to empower people and facilitate progress for positive change for farmed animals. My job is to inspire others like you to act because, frankly, Compassion, on our own, will not achieve the objectives we all wish to see. We must build the broadest of coalitions and the most far-reaching of initiatives to put an end to our present wasteful food culture which has, at its rotten heart, factory faming.

This point was brought home to me recently when I read the report, Plea for Sustainable Livestock Farming, signed by more than 100 professors from Dutch Universities. I was particularly fascinated by the diversity of academic expertise they represented, from environmental science to rural sociology, from Christian philosophy to journalism. Such a broad range demonstrated the wide cross-section of interests united in opposing factory farming. Their recommendations complemented the conclusions we made in our report, Eating the Planet, co-produced with Friends of the Earth. We are now working with the Dutch scholars to take this important initiative to an international audience of academics.

I firmly believe factory farming cannot sustain itself economically. It consumes a far greater proportion of crops, water and other finite resources than it produces benefit – in the form of food for human consumption. Currently, one third of the world’s cereal crop goes to feed the 60 billion or more farm animals reared every year to produce meat, eggs and dairy products – the majority of them on factory farms. This grain drain together with the climate change consequences of the livestock sector – producing one in five tonnes of total human-induced greenhouse gas emissions – is why leading commentators are increasingly encouraging society to consider eating less meat, dairy and egg products. And why Compassion is advocating a less is more approach; less but higher quality, higher welfare meat consumption as a key factor in building a humane and sustainable food future.

To make sure the supply for higher welfare products meets the demand, our Good Egg Awards, for example, encourages public sector authorities and commercial companies to switch to higher welfare products – cage-free eggs. In the three years of the programme so far, we have celebrated such diverse enterprises as Shropshire County Council, Sainsbury’s, the Tate gallery and Hellmann’s for going cage-free on their eggs, and bringing real benefit to 20 million hens every year as a result. This helps increase demand for cage-free eggs and in turn helps support the EU-wide ban on battery cages due to take place in 2012. In my view, involving companies and local authorities in the trend toward a better food system without factory farming is key.

Encouraging evidence of this gathering trend in ethical consumerism was provided by a recent survey published by the food industry research group, Mintel. “The animal welfare factor,” Mintel states, “has been helped by campaigning by celebrity chefs, such as Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Jamie Oliver, who have raised awareness of poultry and pork farming practices.” Compassion is proud to work in partnership with Hugh on his Chicken Out! campaign.

Whether it’s because you oppose animal cruelty, don’t want to eat unwholesome food, care about environmental damage, concerned with food security, alarmed at economic inefficiency or outraged by world hunger – you have a vital and unique role to play to end factory farming by 2050. I promise you Compassion will be with you at every step of the way as we turn the key to success together.

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.