I am often struck by how ill-founded myths sometimes spring up to defend factory farming. Like that old chestnut in defence of battery cages, that ‘if hens weren’t happy, they wouldn’t lay eggs’. Thankfully, scientific evidence and common sense tell us otherwise.
Reading through media clippings recently, I was interested to come across the following quote attributed to a leading figure in the broiler chicken industry: “If we put all those birds currently housed onto free range, there wouldn’t be a mountain in Scotland or a valley in Wales or any spare business land in any town, city or village that would not have a chicken on it. It’s absolutely ludicrous and impossible to achieve. ……” And thus it seems another myth is born, giving the impression that we’d be knee-deep in chickens if those animal welfarists got their way!
Well, here at Compassion, we’ve calculated just how much space it would really take to house all the nation’s broiler chickens free range. And we are happy to share them with anyone. What they show is that, if all the UK’s broiler chickens were reared for meat on free range, they would only need an area around a third of the size of the Isle of Wight. That the total area needed would represent considerably less than one thousandth of the total area of farmland in the UK to rear them in this way. That this would also take into account leaving the ground fallow to prevent it becoming ‘fowl sick’. Add to that the scope for running poultry in wooded areas, like some of the French producers do under the prestigious Label Rouge scheme, and you can see that a free range future for the nation’s chicken flock is much more practical than some believe. And it would offer a real opportunity for UK chicken producers to differentiate their products in a market crowded by the ubiquitous factory farmed chicken.
Of course, free range is not the only way of keeping hens in higher welfare farming systems. The RSPCA Freedom Food scheme, for example, produces chickens for meat reared with more space and an extensive indoor environment. And this is a concept that appears to be taking off with consumers.
All in all, I believe that, far from being “ludicrous”, creating a fairer, free range and higher welfare future for our chickens is not only practically achievable, but would have positive benefits for producers, consumers and food quality alike. You can help us break down the barriers and myths that stand between the present and a better, fairer future for chickens that provide our meat by supporting Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, Compassion in World Farming and our Chicken Out! campaign.













