Posts Tagged ‘chicken’

The things they say…

Monday, July 5th, 2010
Eggs - CC / Flickr

Eggs - CC / Flickr

I am often struck by how ill-founded myths sometimes spring up to defend factory farming. Like that old chestnut in defence of battery cages, that ‘if hens weren’t happy, they wouldn’t lay eggs’. Thankfully, scientific evidence and common sense tell us otherwise.

Reading through media clippings recently, I was interested to come across the following quote attributed to a leading figure in the broiler chicken industry: “If we put all those birds currently housed onto free range, there wouldn’t be a mountain in Scotland or a valley in Wales or any spare business land in any town, city or village that would not have a chicken on it. It’s absolutely ludicrous and impossible to achieve. ……” And thus it seems another myth is born, giving the impression that we’d be knee-deep in chickens if those animal welfarists got their way!

Well, here at Compassion, we’ve calculated just how much space it would really take to house all the nation’s broiler chickens free range. And we are happy to share them with anyone. What they show is that, if all the UK’s broiler chickens were reared for meat on free range, they would only need an area around a third of the size of the Isle of Wight. That the total area needed would represent considerably less than one thousandth of the total area of farmland in the UK to rear them in this way. That this would also take into account leaving the ground fallow to prevent it becoming ‘fowl sick’. Add to that the scope for running poultry in wooded areas, like some of the French producers do under the prestigious Label Rouge scheme, and you can see that a free range future for the nation’s chicken flock is much more practical than some believe. And it would offer a real opportunity for UK chicken producers to differentiate their products in a market crowded by the ubiquitous factory farmed chicken.

Of course, free range is not the only way of keeping hens in higher welfare farming systems. The RSPCA Freedom Food scheme, for example, produces chickens for meat reared with more space and an extensive indoor environment. And this is a concept that appears to be taking off with consumers.

All in all, I believe that, far from being “ludicrous”, creating a fairer, free range and higher welfare future for our chickens is not only practically achievable, but would have positive benefits for producers, consumers and food quality alike. You can help us break down the barriers and myths that stand between the present and a better, fairer future for chickens that provide our meat by supporting Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, Compassion in World Farming and our Chicken Out! campaign.

Consumer Aware

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

These are challenging economic times for everyone. For consumers like us who care about animal welfare, we also want to make sure we support producers and retailers who use higher standards of care. The good news is that increasing numbers of us are buying more meat and dairy products accredited by such programmes as the RSPCA’s Freedom Food scheme and the Soil Association’s organic certification.

Notwithstanding the recession, our public educational campaigns are making a difference. Such high profile campaigns as Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s Chicken Out! are helping people make compassionate choices. Sales of free range, barn and organic eggs increased to two-thirds of the total spent on eggs in the twelve months up to March. In terms of the number of individual eggs sold, one in two is now from hens which do not live in cages. Further, sales of higher welfare fresh chicken meat have grown by one-fifth in the last year compared with virtually no increase in sales of standard chicken. The sales of organic foods, which were initially depressed by the recession, are now growing. This is recession busting news! When consumers become aware they beware of factory farming.

The more people that are educated about factory farming, the more they will want to choose cruelty-free and buy products clearly labelled as humanely produced. This means the demand for factory farmed meat and dairy products decreases and the sale of humane alternatives increases.

Labelling of livestock products is about transparency in the food chain. People want to know how their food is produced and where it comes from. Presently, the only mandatory EU labelling scheme requires egg packs and eggs to be labelled as to farming method (e.g. “eggs from caged hens”, “barn eggs” or “free range eggs”).

Earlier this week, I attended the launch of new research which showed that animal welfare continues to be an important issue for many people. It also showed that people associate better treatment of animals with higher quality products. There is an association between the system of production (e.g. intensively produced as opposed to free range) and the level of welfare the animals are likely to have received. The problem is that most meat from factory farms isn’t labelled as to how it was produced, thus hampering consumers in choosing products of higher quality and better welfare. It surely acts as a significant drag on the sales growth of higher welfare products.

Compassion is calling for labelling schemes that are mandatory and apply to all meat, eggs and dairy products, including domestically produced and imported foods. The information must include the method of production and country of origin. These should be prominently displayed on the product. We advocate using words as well as symbols or logos as they may be misunderstood. In short, we are committed to transparency in the food chain from farm to kitchen.

This is why our Strategic Plan 2009-2014 commits us to “achieve compulsory labelling of livestock products according to system of production in the EU by 2014.”

It is great news indeed that sales of higher welfare chicken and eggs are growing, despite the recession, and thus helping many animals to have better lives. None of this progress would be possible without you and thousands of caring people like you who support Compassion. Thank you! Together we can educate even more consumers to be aware. Why not help us to keep up the momentum for compassionate consumerism by downloading your free Good Food Shopping Guide!

Chickens: progress or slipping backwards?

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Have we just seen standards slip further for broiler chickens?  That’s my question following the decision, by the UK Government, to allow broiler chickens to be packed even more tightly on factory farms.  Especially as, in the bizarre world of Euro-politics, we’ve cautiously welcomed the move.  Why?  Well, only because it’s not as bad as it could have been.

The UK Government’s own recommendations on welfare (PDF) state that chickens reared for meat should not be stocked higher than 34 kilograms (kg) of bird per square metre.  In simple terms, that means a maximum of about 17 birds per square metre of floor space.  

If that wasn’t bad enough, at the turn of the century, the then Agriculture Minister showed total disregard for his own welfare advice by helping to launch a national farm assurance scheme that allows chickens to be packed even tighter.  The Assured Chicken Production scheme, which comes under the ‘Red Tractor’ farm assurance banner, says birds can be stocked at 38kg (or 19 birds) per square metre.  

Now the UK Government has given the green light for an even higher stocking density, with 39kg now being permitted. Okay, only an increase of about half a bird per square metre. But given they are already crammed so tightly, it’s change in the wrong direction.  Backwards, not forwards.  A reduction in welfare standards, despite the outcry following recent public campaigns, not least by our friend and staunch Chicken Out campaigner, Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall.  

Where is the positive in this story?  Especially given that Europe’s dreadful new law allows countries to stock even higher, up to 42kg/sq m, or about 21 birds, in that barren space.  Well, the small mercy is that the UK Government has gone slightly on the better side of bad by ruling that chicken farmers cannot stock so highly.

And all this despite strong scientific evidence from the European Commission’s own panel of experts which says that stocking density should be considerably lower; no higher than 25kg/sq m.  Going much above this level, over 30kg/sq m, and they say there is a “steep rise in the frequency of serious problems” for bird welfare.  We have a long way to go.

As the Government slides backwards, Compassion is working hard with supermarkets and other food companies to ensure that their own standards don’t slip, but continue to rise.  What gives immense support to our efforts is that consumers are increasingly choosing higher welfare chicken, be it Freedom Food indoor reared at lower stocking density, free range or organic.  We can offer consumers advice to promote compassionate shopping for poultry and our good food shopping guide is the perfect companion in the supermarket aisle.

Washington, London and The Olympics

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

You know the old adage, “you are what you eat?” Well, the world is now eating more chicken than ever before.  A fact underscored by my recent trip to Washington DC.  In fact, chicken is by far the most populous farm animal on the planet.  Each year, around 50 billion meat chickens are reared worldwide, most in factory farms.  

Seven out of ten chickens globally are reared industrially.  The predominant type of chicken now used for meat has been developed to grow super-fast, reaching slaughter weight in 40 days or less – that’s twice as fast as they would grow naturally.  

The purpose of last week’s trip to the United States was to meet with our friends at The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and officials at the World Bank.  Both meetings were with a view to forging closer links and developing ways of improving the lives of animals.

Whilst in Washington, I was struck by the pervasiveness of the fast-growing chicken issue.  Let me be absolutely clear; chickens reared for meat are not usually kept in cages. Not in Europe, the USA or much of the world.  Instead, they are reared in their thousands, often tens of thousands, in tightly packed sheds.  Forced to grow so fast, their bones frequently cannot support their body weight.  Painful lameness is often the result.  Their hearts and lungs too may be unable to keep pace with the growth rate.  As a result, more than 100 million birds, just weeks old, succumb to heart failure each year.  

Much of our attention over recent decades has focused, rightly in my view, on the cage and crate forms of factory farming.  Having incarcerated so many laying hens, pregnant pigs and young calves, these systems are now being legislated into history in Europe.  The USA is now going down the same humane path with several states having passed laws recently to outlaw cages and crates.  The most notable is California, which has banned veal crates, sow stalls and battery cages from 2015.  A truly monumental victory.  

The bad news is the number of chickens reared for meat in factory farms rises seemingly unabated.  The issue of fast-growing breeds is rapidly emerging as the big factory farm issue of the 21st Century.  But it’s not just an animal welfare issue.  Chicken is a good example of how factory farming can often threaten human health and food quality, as well as animal welfare.  

In a previous posting, we asked how healthy is cheap chicken? A typical supermarket chicken today contains nearly three times more fat than in 1970.  During the same period, the protein content of a typical factory-reared bird has dropped by 30%.  Indeed, they have now been shown to contain more fat than protein.  Compare this with an organically reared chicken, which has 25% less fat than an intensively reared bird and has the protein/fat ratio the right way around.  You can see that the way a bird is reared really can make a difference to the quality of the food produced.

Returning from Washington, I looked through the Agriculture Action Plan (2010-2012) of the World Bank.  It identifies major outbreaks of livestock disease such as Avian Influenza as a significant risk to public health.  The plan goes on to state, “The rapid rise in demand for livestock products in developing countries has been associated with the growth of unprecedented concentrations of animals…”.  It reminded me of the words of a UN Food and Agriculture Organisation review of Avian Influenza (2005), “Globally, most cases of HPAI [Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza] are believed to have arisen through conversion from a low pathogenic virus derived from waterfowl to a HPAI virus via passage in domestic chickens.  Intensification of poultry production, especially if this is not accompanied by appropriate biosecurity measures, can favour this process because it provides large numbers of highly concentrated, susceptible poultry in which an AI virus can passage, once it gains entry to the flock.”

Back home, it seems particularly ironic that the London Olympics could serve the world’s athletes factory farmed chicken.  Particularly given the level of lameness, and heart and lung problems often associated with factory farmed chicken, not to mention the food quality issues. You are what you eat?  Lame, fat chickens hardly seem the right food for the world’s finest athletes.

The London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG) will soon publish its ‘Food Vision’ for the 2012 Olympics.  We understand that the current proposal would allow factory farmed chicken to be served at this most historic of standard-bearing events.  We are actively engaged in persuading the Olympic Committee to lift the bar and serve meat, including chicken, only from higher welfare production systems.  Your help in our campaign will be crucial in ensuring that the inspiration of the Olympics is channelled into creating better lives in the future.

How healthy is ‘cheap’ chicken?

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

About two-thirds of chickens on sale in the UK have been found to be contaminated with the food poisoning bug, campylobacter. These newly published findings by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) are especially interesting in the light of recent research which suggests that farm animals are more prone to campylobacter infection when stressed.

Scientists at Bristol University have found that “there is reliable evidence that stress increases susceptibility to bacterial infection, including campylobacter”. This could include keeping animals in a poor environment or feeding them a poor diet.

The FSA took over 3,000 chicken samples for its study in 2007 and 2008. According to the FSA, campylobacter is the most common bacterial cause of food poisoning, causing about 55,000 cases of illness in the UK a year. Chicken meat is believed to be the most common cause of illness.

So are chicken factory farms contributing to our food safety woes? To many, it stands to reason that animals will be below their best health-wise if they are kept in barren, overcrowded conditions. They will suffer too.
What is less well publicised is that ‘cheap’ chicken is no longer the low fat option that many believe it is. A typical supermarket chicken today contains nearly three times more fat than in 1970. During the same period, the protein content of a typical factory-reared bird has dropped by 30%. Indeed, they have now been shown to contain more fat than protein. Compare this with an organically reared chicken, which has 25% less fat than an intensively reared bird and has the protein/fat ratio round the right way. You can see that the way a bird is reared really can make a difference to the quality of the food produced.

How lamentable then that the European Union failed to stop the over-industrialisation of chickens ‘grown’ for meat. And now the situation for broiler chickens in the UK could get worse as a result. British birds are currently reared to a stocking density that equates to about 19 birds per square metre of floor space. This is an appallingly high stocking density. New EU rules allow 21 birds in the same space.

Thank goodness then, that increasing numbers of consumers are being inspired to help chickens to a better life and help themselves to better food. Sales of higher welfare chickens have shown a dramatic increase since the brilliant television work of our friend and celebrity chef, Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall. And it’s good that this trend seems to be holding up in the face of the recession. But more needs to be done. Compassion in World Farming is working tirelessly with Hugh to get a fair deal for chickens. Please, if you’ve not already done so, visit Hugh’s Chicken Out! Campaign website and help us bring an end to ‘cheap’ chicken factories in favour of higher welfare, higher quality alternatives such as free range.

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.