Posts Tagged ‘farm animal welfare’

Antibiotics under threat!

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

We take antibiotics for granted. We rely upon them to treat infections caused by bacteria. They’re among the most frequently prescribed drugs we take. But their use also creates opportunities for resistant bacteria to develop. This is why antibiotics should be prescribed only when they’re necessary. Like most, if not all, medications, their misuse has important, even life-threatening consequences.

Take, for example, the prescription of low-level doses of antibiotics for intensively farmed animals. These drugs are not to treat specific sick animals but entire populations of chickens or pigs. Antibiotics are routinely given because of their stressful, unsanitary, overcrowded and confined conditions. They’re often physiologically stretched to the limit to maximise productivity. In short, factory farmed animals are inevitably at high risk of infection.

The antibiotics are given as a pre-emptive move to prevent and control bacterial infections. If these animals were not kept in factory farms but instead outdoors in humane and sustainable conditions, this indiscriminate use of antibiotics would not be necessary.
(more…)

High-welfare is for life

Wednesday, July 6th, 2011

Tonight at the Freemason’s Hall in London’s Covent Garden, Compassion in World Farming will be announcing this year’s winners of The Good Farm Animal Welfare Awards. TV chef Paul Merrett will be hosting the awards and guest speakers include broadcaster Nigel Barden, chef and broadcaster Allegra McEvedy and actress and Compassion Patron Alexandra Bastedo. The awards are in their second year, and again there has been a fantastic response from businesses across the UK and the EU.

Last year big name companies were presented with awards for providing cruelty-free food with the feel good factor; these businesses  are making a real difference for farm animals by ensuring they are being treated with compassion. The first ‘Good Chicken’ awards for higher-welfare chicken were presented to companies such as Marks & Spencer, Waitrose, Virgin Trains, The Co-operative Food, Pret A Manger and Sainsbury’s. Over 200 million animals already lead better lives each year from the higher welfare policies of last year’s Good Farm Animal Award winners.

Compassion in World Farming’s Food Business Team works all year round with business communities across the UK and Europe to actively promote farm animal welfare. Many businesses tonight will rightly be rewarded for their efforts in ensuring animals that are used for food are treated with compassion.

Don’t forget though, we are effecting change on an immense scale and we need to continue to do so to bring cruel practises like factory farming to an end. We, as consumers, must also make the best decisions we can when buying animal food products to ensure the food on our plate is not a product of misery, pain and suffering. Many of the businesses receiving awards tonight have not just based their decision to implement animal-friendly purchase policies on ethics alone. They are not doing so solely because it is the right thing to do, but also because the people that matter the most, their customers, have said animal welfare is important to them.  As you will see from tonight’s awards – compassionate companies do listen.

Farrowing crates & battery cages

Friday, June 17th, 2011

On some things we’ve seen progress, on others progress remains slow.  An example of the latter in Britain is the ongoing use of the so-called ‘farrowing crateto confine mother pigs in industrial systems.  On the other hand, we are on the cusp of a major breakthrough for egg laying hens with a ban on barren cages due next year.

Twenty years ago, I reported on a farming press headline declaring that intensive pig farming was an “industry still in the dark ages”.  The Farmers Guardian article was referring to the use of farrowing crates that are used to confine mothering sows from when they give birth (farrow) to the time their piglets are weaned weeks later.  I quoted two researchers from the University of Guelph as saying, “Crates are so narrow that with almost every move the sow unavoidably rubs herself against the bars and partitions, frequently causing abrasions and, in some cases, swellings”.  I ended the article saying, “Freedom at farrowing is every sow’s right.  The pig industry must drag itself out of the dark ages.  Dispensing with the farrowing crate would be a good start.”  Sadly, twenty years later on, the farrowing crate is still the predominant system for sows kept indoors.  It’s time for change.  We are upping our campaign in the UK and Europe to see an end to this appalling system. 

One major area where it does look like we are seeing progress is with the long-awaited ban on the barren battery cage for laying hens in Europe.  Our Defend the big move campaign aims to make sure that Europe doesn’t back-slide on its promise to consign battery cages to the scrapheap of history from January next year.

Big leap for the ‘big move’

It’s a campaign that has motivated many people; one of them is Jeremy Hayward, the Vice-chair of Compassion’s Board.  Jeremy is taking a big leap – skydiving to raise money for our ‘big move’ campaign against barren cages.  And I’ll be interviewing him soon after his daring feat to find out just how he felt hurtling through the air, arms spread, in aid of hens unable to stretch their wings. 

If you would like to learn more or sponsor Jeremy’s big leap, please click here .

And talking of hens, I’m often asked to write more about my four adopted hens.  So I’ve done just that.  Coming shortly will be a series of blog articles entitled, ‘Living with hens’, giving insights into the way they live; their likes, dislikes and antics as they go about reshaping my previously tidy garden!

A huge thanks to you and all our supporters for flying the flag for farm animals; I remain humbled and overwhelmed by your generosity and commitment.

‘Why is animal welfare of any importance?’

Friday, March 11th, 2011

The new ‘Ask Philip’ section of my blog is a place for you to ask any questions you like, on any farm animal related topic. I’ll do my best to answer them. Many people are worried about asking ‘basic’ questions. But often these are the very ones that are on many people’s minds. So, having a place where they can be aired and discussed, I hope, is valuable. I also encourage questions that do not have ‘obvious’ answers. I hope that the blog will help engage and promote a greater understanding of the issues.

Farming and IndustrialisationI was recently asked the question “How would you explain to a starving family in Africa that animal welfare is of any importance?”.

This particular question made me think, as it shows how much more work still needs to be done if we’re to convince people that action needs to be taken. At Compassion, we campaign daily for improvements in the welfare of farm animals, to improve their lives and well-being. It sometimes comes as a bit of a shock, however, to think that people see this one aspect as our ‘only’ concern.

I appreciate that animal welfare doesn’t come as a priority to many when humans are also suffering; but the way we farm our animals, even in the UK and Europe affects people too.

The production of cheap meat in big ‘factory’ farms undermines the livelihood of smaller farmers looking for a decent price for their produce, but unable to compete with such large-scale organisations. On top of this, animals that aren’t allowed to graze naturally must be fed grain and soya which could otherwise be fed directly to humans. But worse than this, farm animals aren’t protein factories, they are protein factories in reverse. They waste potential food protein. To produce a kilogram of grain-fed meat on a factory farm takes an average of six kilograms of grain. That’s a lot of waste. Especially when we realise that a third or more of the world’s entire grain harvest is being used this way.

Not only this, but using basic foodstuffs – grain and soya – in such a wasteful way on such a huge scale, helps push up food prices worldwide. It does this by inflating the demand for these basic food commodities, meaning that poorer people are less able to buy simple things such as bread.

Factory farming is not only hungry for grain, it is also hungry for new land to expand upon; every year an area of land equivalent to half the United Kingdom is deforested to provide room for the expanding livestock industry and its need to grow grain for animal feed.

So, to answer the question directly: the methods used to farm animals are intrinsically linked to human well-being and the ability of humanity to feed itself. And this is a growing problem in the face of an expanding human population that will stretch our food system still further over the coming years. It’s vital that we find more sustainable methods of farming, because sustainability and global food security go hand in hand. Not to mention other environmental issues such as pollution; as too does the wasteful use of antibiotics to ward off the diseases encouraged by the cramped and unhygienic conditions of factory farms. It has been estimated that half the world’s antibiotics are now fed to farm animals, causing problems of antibiotic resistance.

Putting an end to factory farming is of vital importance for all of the above reasons and more. Through this blog and my daily work, I’ll be looking to help cast further light on these issues. Compassion in World Farming isn’t ‘just’ concerned with animal welfare – we’re also concerned with the welfare of people and the planet too. Ending factory farming will benefit us all.

Of cows, pigs and mega-farms

Friday, January 21st, 2011

As regular readers will know, I’ve put a lot of focus on the spectre of US-style ‘mega-dairies’ coming to the UK and Europe. This follows the proposal for a several thousand cow mega-dairy in Lincolnshire, UK, where the animals would be kept indoors, unable to graze, for most of their lives. At the same time, we are awaiting a planning proposal to be resubmitted for a large-scale pig farm in Foston, Derbyshire.

The trend toward even larger-scale industrialised farming is a huge concern on a number of levels. On animal welfare, as I’ve said before large-scale per se may not be the issue; however, it often indicates a serious underlying threat to animal welfare.

Overly large ‘mega-dairies’, for example, indicate a direction of travel that has seriously damaging implications for cow welfare and the future of many dairy farmers themselves. Large-scale indoor-based farms will raise wider issues of waste management and other environmental threats and public health risks associated with too many animals in too small a space, often presenting a breeding ground for disease spread. Highly intensive farming, where the animals are disconnected from the land, raises serious challenges and speaks more to the past than to the future of humane and sustainable farming.

Over the coming days or weeks, a planning application is expected from Midland Pig Producers (MPP) for a large-scale farm in Foston. The previous application was to keep 2,500 breeding sows and up to 25,000 pigs and piglets indoors. This original planning application was withdrawn.

Compassion has communicated directly with the proposers of the Foston pig farm and engaged with them in much the same way as we strive to do with others involved in possible areas of interest or problem areas. Compassion has urged MPP to commit to any new development being on a higher welfare basis; at least meeting RSPCA Freedom Food standards and EU laws prohibiting routine tail-docking.

We know from our discussions that the company behind the Foston proposal has been considering meeting higher welfare standards, in particular aiming for RSPCA Freedom Food standards. Nevertheless, the sheer scale of the proposal remains deeply concerning.
It presents a dilemma. If the Foston proposal genuinely incorporates higher welfare, indoor-extensive pig husbandry systems throughout, that would be a good thing. On the other hand, the sheer scale of the original proposal remains concerning on those wider issues that come with divorcing animals and farming from the land.

I sincerely hope that, as we expect, the resubmitted proposal addresses fundamental animal welfare issues, such as the extreme confinement of mothering sows, mutilations and barren environments. Anything less would be unacceptable and would see our legal team mount a strong and vigorous objection.

Ohio agrees reforms for farm animals

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Great news from America! A ground-breaking agreement has been reached in the US state of Ohio that will see the phasing out of veal crates for calves, an end to confinement stalls for pregnant pigs as well as other key measures to protect farmed and other animals. The State Governor of Ohio, the Farm Bureau and The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) have agreed on the following landmark advances in Ohio:

  • A ban on cruel veal crates for calves by 2017
  • A ban on new confinement stalls for pregnant pigs in the state after Dec. 31, 2010. Existing facilities must cease using sow stalls within 15 years.
  • A moratorium on permits for new battery cage confinement facilities for laying hens
  • A ban on strangulation of farm animals and mandatory humane euthanasia methods for sick or injured animals
  • A ban on the transport of sick and injured cows, known as ‘downer’ cows, for slaughter
  • Enactment of legislation establishing penalties for cock fighters
  • Enactment of legislation cracking down on puppy mills
  • Enactment of a ban on the acquisition of dangerous exotic animals as pets, such as primates, bears, lions, tigers, large constricting and venomous snakes, crocodiles and alligators.

Huge congratulations to our friends at HSUS for achieving these monumental reforms for farm animals! This is a major victory that will surely quicken the trend against farming practices that cause such suffering to farm animals.

Thank you to those supporters who were able to respond to the call to support this major initiative.

Farm animals in Ohio and the world over will benefit from this reform. Compassion sends a huge vote of thanks and congratulation, particularly to Wayne Pacelle and his dedicated team at HSUS, for making it happen.

CCTV in slaughterhouses now!

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Nearly a year ago, I wrote about the need for CCTV to be installed in all abattoirs to help protect the welfare of animals at a point when they are most vulnerable, at slaughter. Anyone reading the latest exposé in the Sunday Times this week, and reported in other media, could be forgiven for thinking that our slaughterhouse industry remains in the dark ages. And it gives fresh impetus to calls for much stricter monitoring, not just some of the time, but all of the time.

CCTV always on and focused at the killing end of the slaughterhouse seems a simple innovation. After all, as I’ve said before, we live in a country where every High Street is watched by CCTV for our protection and safety. Are farm animals not equally deserving of the same? Particularly at the time when they are killed?

As I did a year ago, I again offer Compassion’s excellent staff and their outstanding expertise to Government to help train their staff to monitor the video footage taken in their country’s slaughterhouses. Round the clock monitoring would surely put to the test any procedure, training programme and compliance mechanism. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that random, unannounced checks of CCTV tapes should be carried out by Compassion to reinforce the independence of the system.

I am delighted to read that the UK’s Food Standards Agency (FSA) supports the idea of CCTV in slaughterhouses, something we will be following up with them. CCTV is not the whole answer to solving the problem of suffering and poor practice in our slaughterhouses. But it does seem to be an obvious step to introduce the transparency that is so badly needed in this aspect of our food system conducted firmly behind closed doors.

Consumer Aware

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

These are challenging economic times for everyone. For consumers like us who care about animal welfare, we also want to make sure we support producers and retailers who use higher standards of care. The good news is that increasing numbers of us are buying more meat and dairy products accredited by such programmes as the RSPCA’s Freedom Food scheme and the Soil Association’s organic certification.

Notwithstanding the recession, our public educational campaigns are making a difference. Such high profile campaigns as Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s Chicken Out! are helping people make compassionate choices. Sales of free range, barn and organic eggs increased to two-thirds of the total spent on eggs in the twelve months up to March. In terms of the number of individual eggs sold, one in two is now from hens which do not live in cages. Further, sales of higher welfare fresh chicken meat have grown by one-fifth in the last year compared with virtually no increase in sales of standard chicken. The sales of organic foods, which were initially depressed by the recession, are now growing. This is recession busting news! When consumers become aware they beware of factory farming.

The more people that are educated about factory farming, the more they will want to choose cruelty-free and buy products clearly labelled as humanely produced. This means the demand for factory farmed meat and dairy products decreases and the sale of humane alternatives increases.

Labelling of livestock products is about transparency in the food chain. People want to know how their food is produced and where it comes from. Presently, the only mandatory EU labelling scheme requires egg packs and eggs to be labelled as to farming method (e.g. “eggs from caged hens”, “barn eggs” or “free range eggs”).

Earlier this week, I attended the launch of new research which showed that animal welfare continues to be an important issue for many people. It also showed that people associate better treatment of animals with higher quality products. There is an association between the system of production (e.g. intensively produced as opposed to free range) and the level of welfare the animals are likely to have received. The problem is that most meat from factory farms isn’t labelled as to how it was produced, thus hampering consumers in choosing products of higher quality and better welfare. It surely acts as a significant drag on the sales growth of higher welfare products.

Compassion is calling for labelling schemes that are mandatory and apply to all meat, eggs and dairy products, including domestically produced and imported foods. The information must include the method of production and country of origin. These should be prominently displayed on the product. We advocate using words as well as symbols or logos as they may be misunderstood. In short, we are committed to transparency in the food chain from farm to kitchen.

This is why our Strategic Plan 2009-2014 commits us to “achieve compulsory labelling of livestock products according to system of production in the EU by 2014.”

It is great news indeed that sales of higher welfare chicken and eggs are growing, despite the recession, and thus helping many animals to have better lives. None of this progress would be possible without you and thousands of caring people like you who support Compassion. Thank you! Together we can educate even more consumers to be aware. Why not help us to keep up the momentum for compassionate consumerism by downloading your free Good Food Shopping Guide!

Flickr

Caged laying hensNocton bus advertisementFace of sow in barren pen with piglets behindLabel Rouge broiler chickens of both sexSow and piglets foraging and one piglet sucklingCute lambs running and jumpingMontbeliard cows on pasturePhilip at FAIBarren veal calf pens

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.