Posts Tagged ‘food’

Seven billion reasons to end factory farming

Friday, October 28th, 2011

The birth of a baby is a wonderful thing. The birth of the seven billionth person alive will be a huge milestone. It both represents the success of our species and throws up the question of our very future on this planet.

Feeding people has always been important. It will be even more so with billions of extra mouths to feed in the coming years.

The truth is that we’re already doing a bad job of it. A billion people are hungry and another billion are malnourished. At the same time, a billion people are obese – overweight to the point where their health is endangered. The divide between rich and poor has perhaps never been so stark.

Over the last half century, the Western world has championed industrialised farming; large-scale production of single crops, be it cereals or animals, fueled by copious chemical fertilisers and pesticides. Our farm animals have disappeared from the land only to be grain-fed and reared in industrial sheds. This is how the vast majority of meat and eggs are produced in Europe and the USA – in factory farms. Sadly, it’s a model now exported around the world. And it’s hugely wasteful.

A third or more of the world’s cereal harvest is fed to industrially-raised animals. If the grain fed to farm animals were grown in a single field, it would cover the entire land surface of the European Union.

But worse than that; factory farms are protein factories in reverse – they waste food, rather than make it. On average, it takes 6 tonnes of plant protein such as cereals or soya to produce 1 tonne of animal protein for human consumption. That’s a shameful waste.

And if that food wasn’t diverted to feed factory farms, it could be fed directly to people. Or the land used for something else. As Professor Steve Jones put it in the Daily Telegraph, “A shift in the production of the commonest crops to feed people directly, rather than to use grain to fatten animals, would increase the calories available by half, and more or less solve the joint problems of shortage and glut”.

Whilst the human population is expected to grow by a further 2 billion or more by 2050, the livestock population is forecast to double, and much of it factory farmed.

Encouraging the spread of factory farming is literally putting hungry people in competition for food with factory farmed animals. The resulting increased demand for basic staples then drives up food prices to the detriment of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable. As Oxfam observed, “Increased demand for grains to feed livestock, coupled with the burgeoning demand from biofuels for feedstocks, is likely to push future food prices further beyond the limits of affordability for the world’s poorest people”.

So we need to stop wasting vast amounts of grain, taking it off the international market and out of the mouths of people to feed factory farms. Instead, we should be looking for better, less wasteful ways of producing food. We need a fairer food system that ensures all people get enough to eat. And that farm animals return to the land where they belong to play a more efficient part in our sustainable food future. Your support for change is needed today more than ever. There are now seven billion good reasons to go beyond factory farming.

What is the cost of moving to higher welfare meat and dairy?

Sunday, October 16th, 2011

Today is Blog Action Day. I do hope that many of you have decided to get involved and have written a blog that is in some way related to food.

Of the many food-based topics that I wanted to write about, I eventually hit upon an area that I think many of you would like to talk about further. Here at Compassion in World Farming, we urge people to choose higher welfare meat, whether that be at the supermarket or when you eat out. But the big question on everyone’s minds (and lips), particularly in the current economic environment is: how much will this cost?

My esteemed colleague, Peter Stevenson, wrote a report recently entitled Reviewing the Costs: the economics of moving to higher welfare farming. This is primarily for the farming community, retailers and the government. It is a research paper of sorts, and one that I have found invaluable. Please do take this opportunity to read it, should you be interested in having some more in-depth knowledge on the subject. However, the point remains, what all of us, ‘the consumers’ want to know is: how much will it cost me when I am shopping and is it worth it?

Many of you, like me, will want to feed your family on humane, sustainable, higher welfare food. Is this financially viable?
(more…)

Blog Action Day

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

It’s that time of year again – an exciting date in many bloggers’ diaries – Blog Action Day.

For those of you who aren’t familiar with it, Blog Action Day is an annual event, whereby bloggers across the globe come together to talk about an issue that effects us all. This year it will take place on Sunday, 16 October. The last time I took part in Blog Action Day was in 2009, when the topic of blogging was Climate Change. This year, we will be coming together to blog about Food.

Food – where it comes from, how we produce it and how it affects us all, is an issue close to the heart of Compassion in World Farming.

Around sixty billion animals are farmed for food worldwide every year – the vast majority of them reared intensively in systems that seriously impact on their welfare. Not only are these systems cruel for the animals reared in them, but in addition, the farming methods used in factory farms are having negative effects on the food produced.

I have written about food security in A Compassionate World in the past and I am urging all readers and fellow bloggers to turn your minds to food and write about the issues that matter to you.

Some suggestions from the people at Blog Action Day, that I hope will give you some inspiration include:

• To be organic or not to be, that is the question.
• Vegan, Vegetarian, Meat eater – Which one are you and why?
• Trading in the future of food. What is the impact of food speculation?
• Will we be able to feed 9 billion people in 2050?
• How does Fair Trade food help farmers and communities get out of poverty?
• The scandal of food waste.
• What is the best way to farm food?

If you need some information or want to scavenge around for some research, then please take a look at Compassion in World Farming’s website. We have plenty of resources that should come in handy and we are happy to help. Get blogging and spread the word!

Register to take part in Blog Action Day 2011
Find out more about Blog Action Day 2011
If you tag your blog and social media updates with the tag #BAD11 your blog and updates will be included on the Blog Action Day website.

Find out more about Blog Action Day

Land Grabbing – An Important Follow Up

Thursday, June 2nd, 2011

Land grabbing continues to make the headlines and cause grave concern for the future and our ability to feed the world’s population.

In my last blog, “Land Grabbing”, I explained how “food-insecure” wealthier countries and private investors are buying or long-leasing vast tracts of land in other countries and often in other continents for their own purposes to satisfy their home markets. This is prompted partly by the growing demand for plant-based biofuels (e.g. ethanol), as our need for oil continues and its cost increases.

From my research at the time of writing the blog, I wasn’t aware of any suggestion of involvement either by the British government or by companies based in the UK in any land grabbing activities. That is until this week. The Guardian newspaper reports that:

“British firms have acquired more land in Africa for controversial biofuel plantations than companies from any other country.”

Land grabbing is something about which I am deeply concerned, regardless of whether it’s Britain involved, or any other country. Further, I strongly take issue with land grabbing when it is used to grow crops to feed to animals or conversion to biofuels. Whenever possible, land should be used to grow food to feed directly to people in that region. Our research shows that it is possible to feed the world without factory farming.

This week I read an important report published by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) which further affirmed my thoughts on the need to move away from industrialised agriculture or ‘factory farming’. The report concluded:

What is required is a rapid and significant shift from conventional, industrial, monoculture-based and high-external-input dependent production towards mosaics of sustainable production systems that also considerably improve the productivity of small-scale farmers.

Again, the recurring theme is that industrial animal production methods — with all of its attendant costs of energy, water, pollution, mono-cropping to grow animal feed, and food-conversion inefficiencies — is the problem. Land-grabbing is also part of the problem as it denies the right of indigenous people to grow food on their own land for their own people.

To access a copy of the UNCTAD report, Assuring Food Security in Developing Countries under the Challenges of Climate Change: Key Trade and Development Issues of a Fundamental Transformation of Agriculture by Ulrich Hoffmann, please click here.

European Parliament says ‘no’ to cloning

Thursday, July 8th, 2010
European Parliament - CC / Flickr

European Parliament - CC / Flickr

The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly for a ban on the sale of food from cloned animals and their offspring yesterday. This is great news for consumers and animal welfare. It is a huge boost in our campaign to stop this particular strain of ‘Frankenstein’ food from being marketed in the European Union (EU).

Our own report ‘Farm Animal Cloning‘ shows that cloning entails severe health and welfare problems for both cloned animals and their surrogate dams. It’s a view that is supported by the European Food Safety Authority’s findings that cloning poses serious health risks for farm animals, including a significant percentage of deaths through cardiovascular failure, respiratory problems, liver or kidney failure, immune-deficiencies or musculoskeletal abnormalities. As our close partner in this campaign, Sonja Van Tichelen from Eurogroup for Animals puts it: “Cloning is inefficient, wastes animals’ lives and causes animal suffering and distress at all stages of the process and must be stopped”.

In our view, any ban in Europe needs to go beyond preventing the marketing of meat and milk from cloned animals. It should also include a prohibition on the marketing of food products from the offspring of cloned animals. This is because clones will be primarily used as elite breeding animals; it is their offspring that will be farmed for meat and milk.

The evidence shows clear suffering on the part of farm animals involved in cloning. Polls show that European citizens don’t want cloned meat on their plates. The European Parliament has spoken out against this unwanted technology. We are now looking to the European Commission and the Member States to follow the Parliament’s lead and agree legislation which would categorically ensure that no products from cloned animals or their offspring would be put into the European food market.

New Year, new era for farming?

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

You could be forgiven for thinking that the introductory statement for the UK’s Oxford Farming Conference this year was written by Compassion in World Farming:

“Agriculture faces a huge challenge which affects every race and country; how to feed a global population of 9 billion by 2050 with less land, less water, less oil and greater climatic extremes whilst minimising the impact on the environment.”

This year’s conference provides the backdrop for a political debate on the future of food and farming. According to the BBC, UK Environment Minister, Hilary Benn MP plans to unveil the Government’s agriculture strategy to 2030, which includes better information for consumers, tackling waste and carbon emissions. The shadow environment spokesman, Nick Herbert, will reportedly use his conference slot to call for a “new age of agriculture” to include a new supermarket ombudsman to protect the interests of farmers.

The BBC Today programme featured a report looking back at the policies that have shaped farming since the middle of last century. It outlines the folly of a singular focus on producing more food quickly; a focus that we can plainly see has had a huge impact on the environment, food quality and animal welfare.

In our view, any ‘new age’ for agriculture needs to avoid making the mistakes of the past. We need an urgent move away from factory farming, with its reliance on artificial fertilisers, pesticides and intensive animal production. Instead, a humane and sustainable food and farming system is needed, which delivers healthy food for a growing population in ways that minimise environmental damage and animal suffering.

Our recent report, commissioned with Friends of the Earth, shows that this aspiration is both possible and practical. It shows that we do not need factory farming to feed a hungry world in 2050. Indeed, the sustainability of our food system requires us to move to farming methods that are kinder to the environment and the animals.

The report, Eating the planet?, produced by the Institute of Social Ecology in Austria and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, concludes that free range farming can feed the world without swallowing up huge areas of wild lands. It outlines the ultimate win-win scenario: feeding the world’s 2050 population without intensive agriculture is not only good for animal welfare but also “provides environmental benefits such as promoting biodiversity and reducing environmental pollution”.

Please help us spread the word. Please help us ensure that future national and international farming policy helps bring an end to factory farming. Why not download our report and send it to your local MP?

Together we can create a humane and sustainable farming future for the world. Thank you.

Prince Charles calls for sustainable farming

Monday, November 30th, 2009

The BBC’s annual Food and Farming Awards this year were extra special thanks to the words of its special guest, HRH Prince Charles, who spoke out against factory farming.  

In his speech at the centenary awards event, the Prince of Wales, a well-known advocate and practitioner of organic farming, asked searching questions of industrial agriculture.  He called into question whether “agri-industry” was the only way to feed a burgeoning human population.  This very same question is discussed in detail in our new report, 'Eating the planet?'.  And our conclusion?  Similar to the Prince’s; that factory farming is not needed to feed the world.

Commenting on the public health implications of factory farming, the Prince said:

“If an industrialised approach to animal husbandry – which increasingly treats animals as machines in an ever more “efficient” system – carries no risk, then why are we seeing e-coli outbreaks in the United States from cattle raised on feedlots, fed on corn (when their stomachs were designed to cope with grass and leaves) and processed in ever-decreasing numbers of abattoirs as big as car factories?

If every technological innovation to increase the productive capacity of industrialised animals far beyond what Nature intended is considered safe, then why did the European Union decide to ban antibiotics as growth promoters in animal feed after they had been in use for fifty years?”

The Prince’s full speech makes compelling reading and underscores the importance of recognising the true cost of industrial agriculture in terms of its environmental and public health impacts.  To this, we would add the huge price in suffering paid by the factory farmed animals themselves.  He warned of the “long-term and unmanageable costs” that are risked if our food and farming system fails to move away from its over-reliance on the industrial model.

The Awards have become known as the ‘Oscars’ of the food and farming world.  The ceremony forms part of a special edition of BBC Radio 4′s, The Food Programme.  Congratulations to our friends at the Food Ethics Council, this year’s winner of the prestigious Derek Cooper Award.  

Compassion is immensely proud to have been recognised by the event in 2007 when we received the award for best food campaigner.  Our campaign for a food system without factory farming has never been more urgent.  The serious animal welfare, environmental and public health consequences of keeping too many animals in too small a space are becoming increasingly recognised.  Our messages are getting through.  We’ve come a long way.  We’ve got so much more to do.  You can help ensure that public recognition of the dangers is truly converted into humane and sustainable ways of producing food.  Please join in today with our campaign actions to end factory farming, the biggest cause of animal suffering in the world.

Climate change: what’s the beef?

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

October 15th is blog action day, with this year’s theme being climate change. What better day, then, to touch on the profound impacts of factory farming and the global livestock industry on our planet.

The top-line is that the world’s livestock is responsible for a massive 18% of greenhouse gas emissions. That’s more than all of our planes, cars and other transport put together. And the bad news doesn’t end there. Currently, 60 billion farm animals are produced each year, the majority in factory farms. According to experts at the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), this figure could double by 2050 as demand surges for meat and dairy products, particularly in developing countries. 120 billion farm animals would bring big challenges to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It would also increase the land, energy and water resources needed to grow the crops to feed them.

As we know from previous postings, factory farmed animals guzzle grain. A third of the global grain harvest goes to feed farm animals.  And just like those big gas-guzzling ‘automobiles’, intensively reared farm animals can be incredibly wasteful; one kilogramme of intensively-reared beef requires around 20 kg of animal feed and nearly 16,000 litres – about a hundred bathtubs – of water to produce.

The projection of a doubling in animal production comes at a time when climate change may make large areas of the world’s current cropland unusable or seriously reduce crop yields due to coastal flooding or drought. A one metre rise in sea level is possible by the end of this century, perhaps even by mid-century. This would flood a fifth of Bangladesh and 2 million square kilometres of land globally. As many as 150-200 million people could be permanently displaced by 2050 due to rising sea levels, floods and droughts. These people might well need to settle on what was previously farmland. Water resources could become so stretched as to cause armed conflicts in some areas.

The huge resources of land, water and energy on which our current intensive livestock production is based, let alone a doubling, may simply not be available by 2050.

As demand for livestock products continues to surge, particularly in developing countries, the onus is surely on the rich world to take a lead on this issue. If we are to have a hope of stabilising the numbers of farm animals worldwide, and mitigating the effects on our climate and precious resources, the European Union and other high-income countries need to reduce meat and dairy consumption by 60% by 2050.

But less is more; instead of eating lots of ‘cheap’ meat from factory farmed animals reared in appalling conditions, the mid-century consumer could be eating less, but better quality meat and milk, preferably reared by local farmers. Under this scenario, farmers would be better able to earn a premium for their products, with higher prices being reflective of the carbon costs of consuming livestock products. This kind of move would not only have climate benefits, but would enable farmers to move toward more extensive, humane and sustainable farming methods, like free range or organic.

These issues and more will be up for discussion at our major lecture event in London on the evening of Thursday 29th October. Lester Brown of the Washington-based Earth Policy Institute will be our special guest speaker and will no doubt have much to say on these important topics. To be there with us, click here for your tickets.

On the subject of lectures, yesterday, I heard Sir Richard Branson describe the battle against climate change as like fighting both world wars at the same time. Given the scale of the task, society surely has to dare to challenge, and make it stick. Reappraising the way we view products from our farm animals has got to be high on the list to address. With a fifth of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock, and factory farming representing the biggest issue of animal cruelty on the planet, the time is right to tackle both issues head-on at once. If we fail to do so, it could be more than beef getting a roasting on planet Earth.

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.