Posts Tagged ‘lancet’

The Road to Change

Friday, May 21st, 2010

Travelling to Oxfordshire recently, I heard an interview with Sir Paul McCartney on Radio 4’s Today programme about his Meatless Mondays campaign. The former Beatle, who is used to being at the top of the music charts, is number one in an entirely different league. Paul’s essay, “Meat Free Monday,” is the most popular download from Ether Books, the publisher of essays for iPhones.

This was encouraging news, I thought, as it was yet another indicator of the public’s interest in ethically-sourced food.

It just so happened that I was on my way to the Food Animal Initiative (FAI) Farms in Wytham, Oxfordshire. I wanted to learn more about their research into commercial farming systems which feature animal welfare as a key value along with environmental protection and consumer affordability. The animals at FAI Farms are free range and include chickens, laying hens, sheep, pigs and cows. The 1,050 acres (425ha) are farmed organically. FAI Farms is a commercial venture which collaborates with Oxford University’s Department of Zoology and enjoys the financial support of such leading food companies as McDonald’s and Tesco.

On my way home I reflected upon how far we’ve come. I was encouraged by what I saw at FAI Farms. I was impressed by how they work with like-minded farmers throughout Europe. They’re developing a network of progressive farmers who are influencing the European Union and its agricultural practices.

Then, I thought, there are other developments which also play significant roles in exposing how intensive factory farming practices are not only cruel but also harmful to the environment and contribute toward unhealthy diets. There’s Lord Stern, author of the government’s influential report on the economic impact of global warming, who urged people to eat less meat. There’s the report, “Livestock’s Long Shadow” from the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, which documents the adverse impact of livestock production on the environment. There’s our own report co-produced with Friends of the Earth, “Eating the Planet”, which showed how we can feed the world without factory farming. Then, I was reminded of The Lancet and its study which showed that reducing adult consumption of animal products by 30 per cent leads to a 15 per cent reduction in heart disease in the UK alone.

These reports – and not forgetting FAI Farms and their development of alternative high welfare farming methods – are helping people to make lifestyle choices like those inspired by Paul McCartney’s Meatless Mondays campaign. For example, in April Cape Town became the first city in Africa to officially endorse one meat-free day a week. The campaign by Compassion in World Farming (South Africa) was unanimously endorsed by the city’s Health Portfolio Committee. Tozie Zokufa, our South African representative, said “It is a triumph. We started negotiating with the City Health Committee last December. Their decision yesterday to work with us on this issue is not only a triumph for human health, but also for the planet and animal welfare too.” Cape Town’s impressive move follows similar action by the Belgian city of Ghent to reduce meat consumption. Countries around the world, including Australia, Finland, Brazil, Taiwan, Canada and the USA, are adopting their own Meatless Monday campaigns.

But as I got closer to home and looked forward to greeting our recently adopted chickens, I had to acknowledge to myself there was still much left to do. Nonetheless, I thought, with Compassion’s many thousands of supporters across the world, and their enthusiasm and tenacity, I know, together, we will end factory farming one day in the not too distant future. When I got home, I rushed outside, gave each hen a treat to eat and told them so.

We have a choice

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

The publication of our report, “Eating the Planet?,” is generating interest and contributing significantly to the debate about how we’re going to feed the world’s growing population without factory farming.

For example, Joanna Blythman, the investigative food journalist and author, Bad Food Britain and The Food We Eat, wrote in the Scottish Sunday Herald:

“Compassion In World Farming, the impeccably well-informed and thoughtful animal welfare organisation, and Friends Of The Earth, our foremost environmental group, argues that we don’t need to go veggie to feed a booming world population and save the planet from climate change and forest destruction. It says that we can indeed produce enough food for everyone in the world, but only if we are prepared to ditch factory farming for more natural and humane farming methods.”

As the year progresses and the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen approaches, I’m increasingly aware of a significant shift in thinking among policy makers, legislators and the public toward understanding why factory farming is cruel to animals, inefficient in food production and significantly contributes to global warming.

For example, in October Lord Stern, author of the British government’s 2006 review on the Economics of Climate Change, told The Times that “Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world’s resources. A vegetarian diet is better.”

Later that same month, Lester Brown, founder of the WorldWatch Institute and Earth Policy Institute, gave our annual Peter Roberts Memorial Lecture and called for a reduction in meat and dairy consumption to fight climate change. He reaffirmed last year’s speaker, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, who said, “One kilo of beef is responsible for the equivalent of the amount of CO2 emitted by the average European car for every 250 kms.”

And then, in late November, one of the world’s leading medical journals, The Lancet, published a report highlighting the climate change and human health benefits of reducing meat production and consumption by 30%.  Entitled The health benefits of tackling climate change, it said that reducing adult consumption of animal products by 30% would lead to a 15% reduction in heart disease in the UK alone.  I blogged about the growing weight of evidence that less is more, particularly when it comes to livestock products and how this can have huge benefits to animal welfare as well as fighting climate change and public health issues.

Also, we shouldn’t forget that earlier this year Swedish authorities set out draft guidelines calling for people to reduce their carbon footprint by eating less meat and in Ghent, Belgium, residents are encouraged to have meat free Thursdays.

As Joanna Blythman noted:

“In other words, we have a choice. We can continue to breed high-yielding, “efficient”, fast-maturing livestock and fatten them up in no time with profligate quantities of grain that would be better fed to humans – just to produce unprecedented volumes of low-grade industrial meat, while trashing the planet in the process – or we can return to rearing livestock on a much smaller scale, using a traditional, extensive farming approach.”

Yes, we do have a choice. To help others make a choice, please download our new report, Eating the planet?

Medical journal says reduce livestock

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

One of the world’s leading medical journals, The Lancet, has published a new report that highlights the climate change and human health benefits of reducing meat production and consumption by 30%.  The summary of the report, entitled The health benefits of tackling climate change says that reducing adult consumption of animal products by 30% would lead to a 15% reduction in heart disease in the UK alone.  

The report, sponsored by the UK Government’s Department of Health and the World Health Organisation amongst others, is the latest to point to the need for a reduction in meat consumption in the rich world in order to combat climate change.   One of its key messages states that “Achieving a substantial cut in greenhouse-gas emissions will depend on reducing the production of food from livestock and on technological improvements in farming”.  

Globally, livestock production is escalating and is predicted to double to 120 billion farm animals a year by mid-Century.  Factory farming is acting as the engine-room of the livestock explosion, enabling large numbers of animals to be reared in small spaces.  Compassion recently hosted one of the world’s gurus on environmentalism, Lester Brown to discuss the links between global food security, climate change and factory farming.  The take home message from the event was that business as usual is not an option; that sustainability centres as much around our plate as our car; and that a wise-use principle is needed in our food system.  

The Lancet study adds to the growing weight of evidence that less is more, particularly when it comes to livestock products.  That consuming less meat and dairy products will benefit public health as well as help combat climate change.  In Compassion’s view, by eating less, but better quality animal products – higher welfare meat and dairy – we can not only help ourselves and the planet, but also reduce a huge amount of animal suffering too.  Now that’s got to be good news.

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.