Posts Tagged ‘Nocton’

The bitter taste of cheap food

Friday, July 13th, 2012

During the successful campaign to stop the proposed 8,000 cow mega-dairy in Nocton, Lincolnshire, one of the leading farmers involved in the opposition campaign was dairy farmer, Neil Darwent.  With arguments raging over the price of milk in the UK, this article by Neil caught my eye.  I reproduce it here with Neil’s kind permission and that of Free Range Dairy.

The bitter taste of cheap food

Was it you?

Did you go into your local supermarket and demand cheap milk?

No. Well, who was it then?

Who said it was okay for retailers and processors to pay dairy farmers less for their milk than it actually cost to produce?

You see the supermarkets tell us that they only stock what the consumer wants. So, if I’ve got this right, people have been going into the supermarkets and saying the following:

  • I don’t care what is in my milk.
  • I don’t care what kind of life the cows that produce my milk have.
  • I am happy to see dairy cows vanish from the British landscape.
  • I am happy to get my milk and dairy products from distant shores with no knowledge of how it was produced.
  • All I care is that the price is low.

Now whoever you are, it’s time you owned up. Because, you see, the reality is there is really no such thing as cheap milk. Somewhere, somebody pays the real price and, right now, it’s the farmers and their cows.

Cutting prices to farmers

The milk buyer Wisemans (now owned by those Muller people who make those lovely yoghurts) have just cut the price they pay to farmers by two pence a litre. Ouch! That will hurt their suppliers.

But wait, there’s more – from August the 1st they propose to cut the milk price by a further 1.7 pence a litre. But Wisemans are the only ones to have ‘declared their hand’ for August until now and you can bet your bottom dollar others will soon follow in their wake.

Costs of production: 30 pence plus; price received by some will be minus 25 pence.

Farmers stand to lose a lot following the two price cuts I mentioned above and many will find themselves on a milk price of less than 25 pence a litre this summer, whilst costs of production are widely quoted in excess of 30 pence.

But what’s that I hear you say? Sainsburys have just increased the price they pay to farmers by 0.26 pence a litre to something over 30 pence. Yes, you’re right, around 324 lucky farmers are getting a price that covers their production. You see, these guys supply Sainsburys with their liquid milk – a line fiercely defended by large retailers because it’s a basic staple that get customers through the door to buy other things.

Just ask them what milk price the farmers who supply milk for their cheese, cream, butter and yoghurts are getting and I think you’ll find it’s substantially less. .

Apologies if I sound like a whining farmer. I’m not begging anyone to bail out poor, down-trodden milk producers. But what I am asking is that you take time to understand why we and our cows are worth more. That’s what Free Range Dairy is all about. So please take a look at the website  if you haven’t done already and start asking questions about where your milk comes from.

Finally, you – yes you – the one who asked for cheap milk – our cows are very disappointed in you.

 

Your Favourite Blogs — and Mine — in 2011!

Friday, January 6th, 2012

My first post on New Year’s Day this year celebrated the ban on barren battery hen cages in the European Union. On January 1, 2012 it became illegal to keep chickens in these cages. But be assured, our work doesn’t stop there; far from it! Now we focus even more intently on other areas of factory farming in Europe and internationally. Our aim for this year is to take the fight against factory farming to new audiences across the world.

Based on the number of visits made last year to A Compassionate World, two of the three most popular blogs were about chickens.

The most popular, ‘Have you seen the news?’ celebrated the historic agreement reached in the USA that could see an end to the barren battery cage there.

‘Why is animal welfare of any importance?’ was the second most popular blog. Here, I explained why Compassion is concerned with farmed animals. It isn’t just because of their welfare. It’s also because factory farming is a wastefully inefficient way of producing food and it harms the environment.

Coming in third place was ‘Reflections on a cage ban’ where I made the link between the EU barren cage ban and the ex-battery hens adopted by my wife Helen and I.

Philip's Hen

Huckle

‘Back at home, our new hen nestles into a bed of straw,’ I wrote. ‘It’s the first time she has ever made a nest. She lays an egg. I can see the difference made to the life of this one sensitive creature. How wondrous then that, from 1st January next year, the tireless efforts of compassionate people everywhere will have touched the lives of so many millions more.’

Another chicken related topic I wrote about was our Good Farm Animal Welfare Awards. This included the Good Egg Award given to companies that pledge to use or sell only cage-free eggs.
(more…)

Why dairy?

Friday, December 16th, 2011

This week, I was asked by the PR firm involved in the proposal for the Nocton mega-dairy why we’ve included industrialised dairy in our new campaign. My answer: Because you made it an issue.

Read more about our battle for food sense and against factory farming’s new frontier here.

Introducing Graham Harvey

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

Yesterday, I was at the Royal Welsh Show where I was delighted to spend time with ‘The Archers’ scriptwriter and agricultural commentator, Graham Harvey. We were both being filmed for a BBC Wales programme on the future of dairying. It was a wonderful opportunity to get to know Graham better and to be able to share some of his story here with you.

Graham works with fiction and facts. He deals in fiction as a writer for The Archers, the celebrated BBC Radio drama series. And facts as an author of an acclaimed series of books on farming in Britain (see We Want Real Food (2006) and The Carbon Fields (2008)). Whether its fact or fiction I know from working with Graham that what he has to say is always insightful and informative.

Philip:  How did you become involved with farming?

Graham:  Other than my grandfather was an agricultural labourer, there is no family connection with farming that I’m aware of. I grew up on a council estate in Reading. I enjoyed being outdoors. I always had an interest in farming. I went to Bangor University to study agriculture.

Philip:  Why does farming fascinate you?

Graham:  It’s the sense of working with nature. It’s an understanding of ecology. Although the farmers I worked with wouldn’t have expressed it that way. I recall from my student days on the farms in North Wales. Many of the farmers had a sense using natural resources for the benefit of people, animals and the land.

When I was an agricultural student, I suppose I had a romantic notion of what farming was about. I was particularly influenced by the books which were published in the 1940s and 1950s. The authors were founders of what became the organic movement. For example, George Henderson’s The Farming Ladder and Newman Turner’s Fertility Farming were inspirations as they saw farming as a vocation. They remind me of a saying I learnt at the time: “You live as if you’re going to die tomorrow but you farm as if you’re going to live forever.” These farmers looked after the land. They were custodians. They were also successful farmers, including financially. They let nature do its work brilliantly. They respected nature and animals.

A key part of farming is that you’re managing nature. A farm, of course, is an artifice or a construct. A traditional sense of farming allowed the natural system to play its role but it was tweaked as needed over the years. The best farm is a mixed farm in which grass and forage crops grown for ruminants are reared in rotation with crops grown for human consumption. This is a very balanced and sustainable system that mimics natural systems. It’s very productive and produces healthy foods.

Philip:  When did you leave farming and become an agricultural correspondent?

Graham:  I went to work on Farmers Weekly in 1972. I was there for five years and then went freelance. I left farming because I was frightened by how much money I would have to borrow to buy a farm. I always wanted to be a writer at school, including working on the local newspaper. I don’t think I would’ve made a good farmer!

I travelled the country for Farmers Weekly reporting on various developments. I saw how farmers were driven by the business of farming. I was quite disappointed that farming was like that. It was about profit and not the ideals of health and biology. It was also the time when we entered the Common Market or, as we know it now, the European Union. I could see what huge changes the Common Agricultural Policy was having. Centuries of development in very efficient mixed family farms, which were in balance with nature, were replaced with specialised farms, which only survived with chemicals and intensification. This is mostly how factory farming came about. These developments sadden me.

Philip:  Did you ever meet Peter Roberts, Compassion’s co-founder?

Graham:  No, I didn’t. I probably first heard about Compassion when I was at the Farmers Weekly. I heard more about you in the 1980s. Joyce D’Silva invited me to speak at one of your meetings in the 1990s.

Philip:  What is your take on animal welfare? Why is it important?

Graham:  I always had a feeling for animals. I always felt a sense of compassion. We have a small flock of Exmoor Horn sheep on three acres of very steep unimproved grassland. It’s so steep that it has never been sprayed. My wife and I have learnt so much from our eight ewes. They enrich our lives just by being sheep. I believe most farmers want to have this kind of relationship with their animals. But they think it’s impossible. I was a vegetarian but now eat meat only from animals where I know how and where they are raised. I believe pasture-fed beef and lamb are particularly healthy foods. My wife, however, has been a vegetarian since childhood.

Philip:  Please tell me about The Archers! How long have you been involved? Who is your favourite character and why? Is it a medium for getting the message out about better food, farming and animal welfare?

Graham:  I started listening to The Archers when I was a student at Bangor University. Then, when I was a freelance farming journalist, I sent in some scripts I’d written. Several months later I got a call and was offered a week’s trial episodes. This was in 1984. I’ve been there ever since. I was a scriptwriter for 10 years. There are about ten scriptwriters in total at any one time. I became the agricultural editor 14 years ago but retired this year to let someone else have a go. The agricultural editor is responsible for coming up with new story lines every month. I’m now back to writing scripts. The writer’s job is to tackle all farming issues in a balanced way. As a writer you inherit a group of fictional farmers who represent all shades of opinion within the farming community. My job is to put across all their points of view. There’s a sufficiently broad range of characters to play with so that a range of farming issues can be explored. It’s important to illuminate issues in a balanced way for an audience who may not know too much about farming.

The Grundy’s are my favourites. I enjoy writing them. I’m more comfortable with Clarrie, Eddie and Joe than with the Archers because I feel I know them the best. In a way they’re the inheritors of peasant farming dating way back to Norman times. They represent the best in peasant characteristics, including good husbandry, care of the land and making good use of resources even though they can be a bit foolish.

Philip:  Last year we visited Peter Willes’ zero-grazed dairy farm in Devon on the same day but at different times. As you know, he was proposing the mega-dairy at Nocton in Lincolnshire. Why was stopping Nocton so important?

Graham:  Quite simply because cows ought to spend their days on grass or pasture. They’re ruminant animals. We’ve bred them for 5,000 years to convert grass into pasture-fed meat and milk. Ruminant animals that graze produce healthier meat and milk to eat and drink. British farming should be based on the mixed family farm.

Philip:  Can we stop industrialised factory farming?

Graham:  Yes, consumers can stop it. But they need to understand the issues. This is what I’d like to see happen. I want to see a level of public consciousness which would make it impossible for animals to spend their lives in sheds. Industry is driven by the idea that milk is being repositioned as a low cost commodity for the world market in, for example, south east Asia. There’s an alternative vision, however. Milk from pasture based farming as an intrinsically healthy food. But the economic force is behind the infrastructure of mega-dairies, including machinery and buildings, which are all places where corporations make money.

Philip:  Tell us about Pasture Promise TV. What are its aims? Why is it important? How people can see it?

Graham:  Pasture Promise TV is a new project which explores in short documentary films different aspects of pasture farming. We will make them widely available on a dedicated site we’re calling Pasture Promise TV. Our central philosophy includes animal welfare as well as biodiversity, food quality, family farms and the environment, so we are four-square behind everything you do at Compassion. Our core funding is for films that will interest farmers, but we’re trying to find ways of making films that will be of interest to consumers, environmentalists, and indeed everyone.

Philip:  That’s an exciting project! Pasture Promise TV and Compassion have common themes. Our aims are convergent. I look forward to us working closely together.

Graham:  I look forward to it!

Mega-dairies and the future

Monday, February 21st, 2011

Wisconsin, USA: The withdrawal of the proposal for a US-style mega-dairy in Lincolnshire, England, is a huge victory for the many people and organisations that put so much into stopping this unwelcome style of dairy farming coming to the UK. And writing from Wisconsin, having just seen the US mega-dairy on which the Nocton proposal was based, I am able to appreciate still further what this victory means. It is a victory for Britain’s human-scale dairy farmers, for dairy cow welfare, for the local community in Lincolnshire, and for the environment. It is also a victory for the future integrity of our milk.

The campaign brought together a broad and diverse range of people and interests; foodies, environmentalists, animal welfarists, family farmers, local people and more. It was this very diversity that made the campaign so strong. And it points to future winning strategies; that the campaign to end factory farming need not, and should not, be solely about animal welfare, hugely important though it is. It speaks to the fact that factory farming all too often threatens our environment, our public health and the quality of our food. And that these linkages are increasingly being recognised. They are increasingly motivating people. There is now huge opportunity to mobilise against factory farming in a way that engages people on their terms, their interests; and it need not always be about animal welfare. These wider concerns can often be more powerful. Indeed, in the case of the Nocton proposal, it was the objection by the Environment Agency that appeared to prove the knock-out blow.
(more…)

Is a big farm a bad farm?

Friday, January 14th, 2011

Are large-scale dairy farms necessarily bad? That was the question I was asked earlier this week when presenting at the New Year Seminar of the Royal Veterinary College in London. It was accompanied by the example of a dairy farm in Malta with only a handful of cows, kept permanently indoors. My answer? That large-scale per se may not be the issue; however, it often indicates a serious underlying threat to animal welfare. Overly large ‘mega-dairies’ indicate a direction of travel that has seriously damaging implications for cow welfare and the future of many dairy farmers themselves.

So, to expand, we have to ask ourselves why anyone would want to take thousands of cows out of fields and house them indoors, as with the proposed Nocton ‘mega-dairy’ in Lincolnshire, UK. How did we get here? The answer lies in a trend toward breeding cows for ever higher milk yield.

Thirty years ago, the average UK dairy cow was producing 5,000 litres of milk a year. No mean feat when you consider that today’s beef cow, milking at a more natural level, will produce about a thousand litres. However, the dairy cow of today is often yielding more like 7,000 litres a year. As production levels increase, the cow’s body begins to struggle to keep up with her over-working udder. If she is to avoid milking off her own back and becoming unwell, she is ‘topped up’ with higher energy concentrates. But it doesn’t stop there. Today’s higher yielding cows are producing an incredible 10,000 litres a year. And it has been suggested that the proposed Nocton cows may achieve even more! At this level, the simple truth is that a cow cannot survive on grass. She cannot physically graze enough to keep up with the demands of her heavy lactation. Her diet is heavily geared toward higher energy forage and concentrates. At this point, it often becomes uneconomic to keep the animals outdoors.
(more…)

Looking Back at 2010

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

Who can resist looking back on a year as it comes to a close? Well, I can’t!

As I think about 2010 and farm animals worldwide I am mindful of what we’ve achieved and ready to meet the opportunities a new year brings. But let’s be clear about the formidable challenge we face. Two out of three farm animals on the planet are factory farmed. That’s a shocking statistic; and behind it, lies billions of individual tragedies. But, as the world’s finite resources become ever more scarce, and people more aware, there is real hope, I believe, that we can end the patently wasteful and unimaginably cruel factory farming.

But today, let’s just take a moment to look back at just some of the highlights of the past year…
(more…)

Did bankers assess mega-dairy impact?

Monday, December 13th, 2010

Following on from our recent blog entitled “Is the UK Government failing on mega-dairies” we now focus our attention on the shortcomings of Clydesdale Bank who have approved the mortgage and debentures for the Nocton proposal – the controversial super dairy project which will see the indoor housing of more than 3,000 cows.

Clydesdale bank has been criticised because it has refused to state what environmental assessments took place before the £13 million land deal was approved.  The original application from Nocton Holdings Ltd was withdrawn after the local council expressed concerns over the environmental impact of the plans. No doubt the intense public pressure was also a factor. We believe that Clydesdale Bank should have taken additional care upon granting the funding for the project to go ahead.

(more…)

Flickr

Caged laying hensNocton bus advertisementFace of sow in barren pen with piglets behindLabel Rouge broiler chickens of both sexSow and piglets foraging and one piglet sucklingCute lambs running and jumpingMontbeliard cows on pasturePhilip at FAIBarren veal calf pens

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.