Posts Tagged ‘Organic’

Organic farming and animal welfare

Tuesday, September 11th, 2012

I felt compelled to write to The Guardian newspaper recently following an article by Julian Baggini, which questioned whether organic standards mean higher welfare. I wanted to make it clear that, in my view, there are good reasons to believe they are. I’m pleased to see that my comments were published in today’s paper, and thought it worth posting here too.

So, in the UK and Europe at least, what are those reasons to suggest that organic means higher welfare?

Firstly, the welfare requirements are higher. For example, the rules of the Soil Association, a leading organic standards setter in the UK, require pasture access for cows and buying organic milk is one way of ensuring that dairy products are free-range. Laying hens are kept free-range throughout their lives. Soil Association eggs come from hens which haven’t been beak trimmed. Britain’s organic pigs are not subject to mutilations such as tail docking or teeth clipping. EU organic rules require piglets to stay with their mothers longer, reducing health problems and the need for antibiotics. These are just a few examples.

A healthy animal should need few if any antibiotics. In the UK, antibiotics are used by organic farmers to treat sick animals. The important difference in organic farming is that antibiotics are not used routinely, unlike intensive farming where they are often used to prop up a fundamentally unhealthy system.  The basis of good farming, including organic farming, is to keep antibiotics as a back-up, not a routine part of an armoury aimed at controlling disease in animals whose immune systems are weakened by the stress of intensive farming.

In addition to good welfare rules, the Soil Association, the RSPCA and leading researchers are pioneering practical ways to measure welfare outcomes such as lameness in cows and feather pecking in chickens.  This will help give further assurance that higher welfare systems are actually delivering better lives for the animals in practice too. 

For all of these reasons, Soil Association organic standards recently came out top in Compassion in World Farming’s analysis of welfare standards. Of course there are non-organic schemes and systems with good welfare – conventional free range or Freedom Food for example.  Shoppers looking for higher welfare food choices should certainly consider organic to be amongst them.

Organic: When equivalent isn’t the same

Friday, May 18th, 2012

I’ve just arrived back from the USA where I’ve been working with our new US director, Leah Garcés.  Whilst there, Leah briefed me on a particularly worrying issue that’s arisen around organic foods.  Having labels that we trust is a big part of building confidence in our food system.  When the labels are misleading or meaningless, that is when things start to go wrong. 

Sadly, existing labels can be a minefield.  In the UK, our recent report showed how the ‘Red Tractor‘ label all too often assures little more on animal welfare than compliance with minimum laws.  It’s a position the scheme sadly hasn’t budged from since I analysed Britain’s main farm assurance schemes ten years ago. 

On a more positive note, our latest assessment shows the Soil Association organic label as coming top in the animal welfare stakes, just as it did a decade ago.    

Whilst in the US, I was deeply concerned to learn about a recent announcement stating that the world’s two largest organic markets – the EU and the US – had entered into an ‘equivalency’ agreement. This means that organic farm animal welfare products from the US can be sold as ‘equivalent’ to EU farm animal welfare products, and vice versa.  What’s the problem? Put simply, they are not equivalent!  In general, US organic standards for animal welfare fall well below those in the EU. In fact, some of the practices permitted in the US organic standards would be illegal in the EU.

For example, electric goads are banned outright in EU organic standards. They are permitted under some circumstances in the US organic standards. Another example, organic standards in the US don’t necessarily have to allow animals to have outdoor access, i.e. dirt beneath their feet and sky above their heads.  There are pending proposals to change this, but they are likely to take years to come into effect.  At present US organic farms may use so-called ‘porches’, which are areas enclosed with screens, concrete floors and a roof. That’s a far cry from what the EU consumer expects from an organic label. Ducks on US organic farms don’t have to be given access to a pool or lake to swim in. The list goes on. 

Next month, this agreement comes into effect.  EU citizens may see USA farm animal products on their shelves with the label ‘organic’, despite them not having to be equivalent to EU standards on animal welfare grounds.  It seems to me that this development can only serve to drag down the good name of ‘organic’ across the board; unless something is done, and quick.

Thankfully, there’s an opportunity to make a difference. At the end of May, the US National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) will discuss revising these standards. We must urge the NOSB to make US standards truly equivalent. They need to put farm animal welfare first.

Our US director will be attending this meeting. We’ll be calling for urgent revisions to ensure that consumer expectations on animal welfare are genuinely met across both regions. Please help us by ‘liking‘ our action on Facebook so we can let them know how upset EU consumers are about this agreement.

At the same time, if you’re out shopping for meat, milk or eggs, please continue to look for products clearly labeled as ‘free range’, ‘Freedom Food’ or Soil Association organic.

As always, thank you.

Better food labelling now!

Monday, March 5th, 2012

BBC Countryfile last night raised the important issue of food labelling.  It’s an issue that really should have much greater prominence. 

For far too long, meat and milk from the factory farm has been allowed to hide behind labels such as ‘farm fresh’.  Yes, food produced to genuinely higher standards, such as free range, organic or Freedom Food will be labelled.  But it competes on the shelf with labels that all too often give a misleading impression of how the food is produced.  This makes compassionate consumerism all the more difficult.

That is why Compassion in World Farming has joined forces with our friends at the RSPCA, Soil Association and the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) to launch a new campaign for better food labelling.  We want to see all meat and milk labelled according to how it was produced.  We have already won this for eggs; eggs from hens in cages have to labelled as just that; ‘eggs from caged hens’.  We want to see the same rule applied to intensively farmed chickens reared for meat, to pork and bacon from animals bred and reared indoors, and, well, the same principle applied to all products from animals. 

The recent furore over plans, now withdrawn, for a US-style mega-dairy in Lincolnshire has also brought the labelling of milk to the fore; have the cows been kept in large numbers, confined on concrete and sand or have they been kept in fields during the grazing season? 

I believe consumers have a right to know how their food is produced.  Our new campaign is aimed at achieving just that; clear labelling by law.  So that consumers can be absolutely sure how their food is produced.

Please support our campaign.  Over the coming months, we’ll be offering you plenty of ways you can get involved.  And remember; when shopping for food produced to genuinely higher standards of welfare, look for terms such as ‘free range’, ‘organic’ or ‘Freedom Food’.

An ethical Christmas feast

Friday, December 17th, 2010

A colourful characterWith Christmas coming up, many people are buying turkeys for the big day. Around ten million will be consumed over the festive period; but how do you know if your turkey has been reared in accordance with higher animal welfare standards? The same goes for smoked salmon, another popular choice at this time of year. There’s a lack of clear labelling information and this can be a real problem for consumers who choose to buy ethically. Farm assurance schemes often claim animal welfare attributes, but how do you know which is best?

Compassion in World Farming, in collaboration with OneKind, has done the research for you, with a detailed analysis of the welfare standards of the main farm assurance schemes in Britain. This report covers aspects of farming including environment, husbandry, stockmanship, genetics/breeding and auditing. Compassion and OneKind’s briefing is available for you in advance of the full report, which I’m happy to say will be available in the New Year and covers other species.

Labels to look out for include: Organic (Soil Association) – which offers significant welfare benefits compared to the standard industry practice, RSPCA Freedom Food – which covers both indoor and free-range systems for turkeys and a number of welfare benefits for farmed salmon. Make sure you look out for ‘Free Range’ turkeys as these animals will have enjoyed fresh air and outdoor freedom. Ones to avoid are those with no logo, or terms such as ‘Farm Fresh’ or ‘Country Fresh’, as these are likely to have been reared intensively in factory farms. Those marked with the Red Tractor logo are likely to be from animals who have often been offered little more than compliance with minimum legislative requirements.

A major concern for consumers who want to buy ethically is the price, but it really doesn’t cost much more to buy a turkey or salmon that’s been given a decent life. A recent survey has shown that free range turkey costs around £1 more per kilo than intensively reared alternatives, or even less if you are willing to put a bit more research into it. Most retailers, particularly major supermarkets, offer free-range turkeys.

This Christmas, please make sure you take a careful look at the labels to ensure that your turkey has been reared compassionately.

Flickr

Caged laying hensNocton bus advertisementFace of sow in barren pen with piglets behindLabel Rouge broiler chickens of both sexSow and piglets foraging and one piglet sucklingBarren veal calf pensCute lambs running and jumpingMontbeliard cows on pasturePhilip at FAI

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.