Posts Tagged ‘sustainability’

Feeding the world without factory farming

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

We don’t need to be cruel to farm animals to feed people, now or in the future. That’s the conclusion of “Eating the Planet,” our latest research commissioned jointly with Friends of the Earth. The report, produced by the Institute of Social Ecology in Austria and the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, concludes that free range farming can feed the world without swallowing up huge areas of wild lands. It outlines the ultimate win-win scenario: feeding the world’s 2050 population without intensive agriculture is not only good for animal welfare but also “provides environmental benefits such as promoting biodiversity and reducing environmental pollution.”

All of this is extremely heartening news because two out of every three farm animals worldwide are currently in factory farms. Some policy makers wrongly suggest the only way to feed a burgeoning human population is to condemn even more farm animals to a life of unimaginable suffering. Now we have detailed proof to strongly refute this argument.

The report is clear about the challenge. Our planet is under increasing pressure. We face the double-whammy of increasing human land use and climate change. Both may well undermine our ability to feed everyone. Feeding the world sustainably, fairly and humanely in the coming decades, as the report says, is therefore “one of the greatest challenges facing humanity.”

The key findings are:

• Feeding the world in 2050 is possible without using the most intensive forms of animal and crop production or a massive expansion of land for farming
• Humane methods of farming animals can provide sufficient food to feed a growing world population
• Providing sufficient food for all would be helped greatly if rich countries adopt healthier, lower meat-based diets and food is distributed more equally
• Sufficient food can be provided in 2050 without further deforestation.

‘Eating the planet?’ offers a number of urgent policy recommendations. These include a call to governments and intergovernmental agencies, such as the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, to set targets and incentives to support the shift toward what it describes as “lower-input, extensive livestock production.” It also encourages governments to support meat-reduction strategies to help reduce animal stocking densities and move from intensive to more animal-friendly extensive methods.

I discuss elsewhere how factory farming is the engine-room of the global livestock explosion. It not only causes huge suffering to billions of sentient creatures but also wastes precious resources such as grain and oil. What is so ground-breaking about this report is that it clearly shows factory farming as a huge mistake for today and tomorrow. To feed the world we must switch to a form of agriculture which is better for animal welfare, gentler on the planet and enables us to feed the world’s population for ever.

Please help us make sure this report and its vitally important messages are read as widely as possible and acted upon by governments worldwide. We will use this report extensively in our campaigning and lobbying work nationally and internationally. I will keep you informed of progress. Now is the time for us to act together. Your support, as ever, is crucial to our success. Thank you!

Medical journal says reduce livestock

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

One of the world’s leading medical journals, The Lancet, has published a new report that highlights the climate change and human health benefits of reducing meat production and consumption by 30%.  The summary of the report, entitled The health benefits of tackling climate change says that reducing adult consumption of animal products by 30% would lead to a 15% reduction in heart disease in the UK alone.  

The report, sponsored by the UK Government’s Department of Health and the World Health Organisation amongst others, is the latest to point to the need for a reduction in meat consumption in the rich world in order to combat climate change.   One of its key messages states that “Achieving a substantial cut in greenhouse-gas emissions will depend on reducing the production of food from livestock and on technological improvements in farming”.  

Globally, livestock production is escalating and is predicted to double to 120 billion farm animals a year by mid-Century.  Factory farming is acting as the engine-room of the livestock explosion, enabling large numbers of animals to be reared in small spaces.  Compassion recently hosted one of the world’s gurus on environmentalism, Lester Brown to discuss the links between global food security, climate change and factory farming.  The take home message from the event was that business as usual is not an option; that sustainability centres as much around our plate as our car; and that a wise-use principle is needed in our food system.  

The Lancet study adds to the growing weight of evidence that less is more, particularly when it comes to livestock products.  That consuming less meat and dairy products will benefit public health as well as help combat climate change.  In Compassion’s view, by eating less, but better quality animal products – higher welfare meat and dairy – we can not only help ourselves and the planet, but also reduce a huge amount of animal suffering too.  Now that’s got to be good news.

Flickr

Campaigners outside the Polish Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden DSC00756Campaigners in Bratislava, Slovakia Supporters sign a petition to defend the the hens in Warsaw, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in The Hague, NetherlandsMr. Jankowski, The  Ambassador’s personal councilor with Amalia Sotirhou at the Polish Embassy in Psychiko, GreeceCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Berlin, Germany Campaigners at the Polish Embassy in Helsinki, PolandCampaigners at the Polish Embassy in Tallinn, Estonia

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.