Posts Tagged ‘sustainable intensification’

“Sustainable” Intensification

Tuesday, December 11th, 2012

Today, Chatham House in London is holding a conference entitled ‘Sustainable Intensification: miracle or mirage? Compassion has a clear view about Sustainable Intensification: it’s an oxymoron! Intensification of livestock farming has brought the EU farming industry to its knees. Many farmers, their farm animals and the environment are in a sorry state as a result of the intensification of farming, pushing out small-scale farmers in the pursuit of big agri-businesses with high inputs and high outputs (of products but also pollution).

Intensification of livestock farming is exactly why Peter Roberts founded Compassion in World Farming – as a farmer he could see first-hand the damage being caused to farmers, their animals and the environment. The intensive model in the EU, USA and now being aggressively pushed elsewhere is entirely unsustainable on every level. To become sustainable for people, the planet and farm animals, farming in the ‘west’ must de-intensify.

I was struck by the words of a prominent speaker: “We produce enough food for every man, every woman, and every child on the planet”. He then went on to outline the shameful reality that a billion people go to bed hungry each night. He called for greater support for the 500 million small farmers who produce the majority of the world’s food. I couldn’t help but agree, and told him so. I suggested that ‘sustainable intensification’ was a loaded term, so often used as a flag of convenience by industrial agricultural interests to push factory farms, chemicals and GM. I pointed out that factory farms waste food, not make it. That enough cereal to feed three billion people is currently fed to industrial livestock who give back a fraction of the food value in terms of protein and calories. I also suggested that the discussion would have been better framed around the more open question of how to feed tomorrow’s population properly and sustainably. Instead the conference focused on the grossly ill-defined term of ‘sustainable intensification’; a wasted opportunity.

Compassion’s most recent research shows that intensifying livestock farming through moving to grain-based animal feeds would make food security harder to achieve, particularly in the most vulnerable areas of the world, including parts of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Pursuing intensification of livestock is just unacceptable. We call on governments and investors to support extensive farmers in both the industrialised and less industrialised parts of the world, to achieve better food security and healthy diets for all. You can read our new Statement on Sustainable Intensification here.

How to feed a hungry world?

Thursday, November 1st, 2012

How are we going to feed 9 billion people in 2050?

Some say we need more of the same. They call it ‘sustainable intensification’. What they seem to mean by this is more production. More factory farmed animals. More genetically modified products. And more chemicals to grow the crops.

But I disagree. We already produce enough food to feed a population of 10-12 billion people. But so much is wasted; be it through our bins, being left to rot or fed to factory farms. Industrial or ‘intensive’ farming methods and wasteful food habits are an ineffective way of trying to feed a growing human population, and that needs to change.

With a billion of the seven billion people on the planet already hungry, and the prospect of 9 billion mouths to feed by 2050, Compassion in World Farming, in conjunction with The Tubney Charitable Trust and World Society for the Protection of Animals, commissioned a study from the Institute of Social Ecology at the Klagenfurt University in Vienna.

The study, ‘The Impact of Industrial Grain Fed Livestock Production on Food Security: an extended literature review’, found food security is put at risk by intensive livestock farming, low crop production and high meat consumption. Whereas, extensive livestock farming improves food security by providing fuel, fibre and fertiliser as well as improved farm animal welfare.

To read the report, including a four page summary, please visit our website.   

The answer to feeding 9 billion people in 2050 isn’t increased intensification and factory farming. All aspects of food security and nutrition must be addressed. This includes reducing food loss and waste. We must also avoid the overconsumption of meat. It’s not just because it’s damaging the planet and animals, but because it’s linked to diseases such as cancer and heart disease.

This is why we call on government and non-government agencies to act now in future food security assessments and policies by:

  • Developing humane-sustainable food security strategies, including farm animal welfare
  • Reversing the intensification of livestock farming and seek optimal farming
  • Reducing the quantity of arable crops, especially cereals, fed to livestock
  • Promoting sustainable, lower meat diets and address food losses and waste.

Feeding 9 billion people in 2050 is the fundamental challenge facing humanity. Let’s start by recognising that the current system already produces more than enough for that many people. The key to an effective food system for the future is cut out waste wherever possible and stop the industrial feeding of animals that already swallows enough grain every year to feed 3 billion people. That way, we can enhance food security today as well as tomorrow.

DEFRA Developments

Wednesday, September 5th, 2012

Compassion is anchored in the original mission of our founders, Peter and Anna Roberts, as an animal protection organisation. Since our founding in 1967, Compassion has grown to become an international force against factory farming. With thousands of caring people throughout the world who support our work, we have worked hard together to accomplish many significant victories

We have also witnessed many changes. A notable one came to mind this week. It was prompted by David Cameron’s announcement of a new UK Cabinet. The significant change I was thinking of was how the number of governments we now deal with on animal welfare has increased. In the 1960s, Compassion only dealt with the UK government in the Palace of Westminster, London. Today, we work with the Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament, the European Parliament and governments throughout the EU. This is partly a sign of the political times, but also of how Compassion has grown into a European and, increasingly, international voice for animals.

In Britain, of the outgoing DEFRA ministers, Compassion worked more with Jim Paice than Caroline Spelman. Although we didn’t always agree with him, we found Jim Paice to be approachable, attentive and sympathetic on some issues. For example, he was committed to bringing the debeaking of laying hens to an end. He also fully supported the EU ban on the barren battery cage. But we disagreed on cloning, which we oppose; and he refused to oppose mega dairies and promoted the oxymoron idea of sustainable intensification.   
(more…)

Filthy business

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

There is real progress being made for farm animal welfare in the European Union. The New Year will see us celebrate a ban on barren battery cages for laying hens. The long-term use of cruel sow stalls for pregnant pigs will be banned the year after. Veal crates – narrow premature confines for calves – are already history.

However, factory farming’s new frontier is the US-style mega-dairy. I saw dozens of these recently in California’s Central Valley and they were far from pretty. Thousands of cows crowded on dirt; not a blade of grass anywhere. This is what is known as ‘zero-grazing’.

We were pleased that, after months of campaigning, a proposal for a 3,700 cow mega-dairy in Lincolnshire, UK was withdrawn. The average dairy herd in Britain is currently about a hundred cows. We were deeply disappointed when Powys County Council ignored strong opposition to agree a 1,000 cow mega-dairy at Leighton near Welshpool. It is a set-back that has only strengthened our resolve to oppose this new threat, not just in the UK, but across Europe.

I don’t believe that big always means bad; intensification is the real crux of the issue. Britain’s biggest breeding pig farm, for example, is run along extensive lines with the sows kept outdoors. But highly intensive farming methods often go hand-in-hand with scale, as is the case with mega-dairies and meat chicken farms.
(more…)

Flickr

Caged laying hensNocton bus advertisementFace of sow in barren pen with piglets behindLabel Rouge broiler chickens of both sexSow and piglets foraging and one piglet sucklingCute lambs running and jumpingMontbeliard cows on pasturePhilip at FAIBarren veal calf pens

Compassion videos

Commenting Guidelines

I want a lively blog and actively welcome comments - both for and against. Please keep them clean and respectful of others' views. We will delete any comments that contain swearing, advocate any forms of violence, are defamatory, or for legal reasons. We reserve the right to correct any misspellings/typos, and may edit comments for reasons of space.